Yes, because the illegal border jumpers moved by cartels are NOT the problem. Just the people that want our borders secure and our immigration laws enforced.
I can’t speak for the dreamers but when I was a child I had plenty of “invasion” plans, although they were much more limited in scope – typically involved my plastic toy army against a friend’s plastic toy army, or capturing another kid’s flag, etc.
If 10:29 is right, then the USA finds itself with a population of foreign children capable of planning a coordinated effort to (1) raise funds to pay for an illegal border crossing, (2) work out the logistics of the journey, and (3) successfully lobby a state government to arrange for healthcare funding. To say nothing of the grooming they did on their parents to convince them to leave their homes and jobs to make the journey.
If that’s so, then we need to give these kids healthcare not for “moral” reasons, but in the interests of self-preservation. Because if these toddlers can do all of this now, imagine how much more formidable they’ll be when they get a little older. We need to keep them on our side.
Actually I did read it. And my response is who cares? Their parents were illegal so are children. Your appeal to moral authority is meaningless to someone who cares about MY country.
I truly do not care about the illegals’ children. Their parents are criminals ad initio in this country. I support the incoming administration’s policy to break-up families via deportation. There are consequences for sypathizers. If this is what it takes to deter illegal immigration so be it.
The Democrats obsession with identity politics and the Republicans inhumanity leave me as a political nomad. Is it too much to ask to have a party that is sane and humane? Apparently so.
Ah, yes, “self-reliance.” Tell me about how virtuous your work ethic is and imply that others with less have no one to blame but themselves. If only if they worked as hard as you!
How exactly did the Walton kids become “self reliant”? Are you excited to see how “self reliant” Jeff Bezos’ kids are? How about Elon Musk’s kids? Because for the rest of our natural lives, these nepo-babies are going to have an outweighted influence on our law, society and culture. FUN!
Going to side tangent away from immigration and discuss this “self reliance” modern day conservatives love so much for a moment.
While I do agree self reliance is important and there are probably too many abuses in our welfare system, conservatism has gone too far and basically handed our country over to corporations in the name of “free market” and self reliance.
Conservatism used to be about government leaving the little guy alone. Now it just seems squarely aimed at corporate welfare for the millionaires and billionaires.
So I reject “self reliance” if what it looks like in practice is letting a man who has worked a blue collar job for 30 years to support his family die of cancer because he can’t afford treatment even though he has health insurance.
And that is why so many of us feel stuck in the middle. The democrats won’t stop with the constant identity politics long enough to actually pass bills to help people, and the republicans will let you starve and die in the name of “self reliance” if you’re not a millionaire.
The real solution is to get rid of partisan primaries. Congresspersons have to pander to the craziest, most extreme people in the base in order to be nominated. In gerrymandered districts, the primary is effectively the general election.
That’s nonsense and solves nothing. I have no beef with 3rd and 4th parties. But as long as the Uniparty reigns we cant get politicians that actually WANT to serve the people. Retroactive Term limits (turnover) is the start.
Very much like whats happening with our judges and a certain “judgemaker” that holds the keys to the kingdom, as it were.
GTFOH! Break the law and go to jail (or get deported) separation is inherent in the system. I know plenty of accused lawbreakers that get separated for a myriad of arbitrary reasons and they don’t bitch about it.
Likewise, there are no hearts bleeding for them in any event. I am betting that you shed no tears for Rob Graham’s wife, kids or soul.
11:43, are you implying that America has no moral center or grounding, or that morality and country are fundamentally at odds with each other?
To be sure, there’s a lot of talk nowadays about how America is broken, and a lot of yearning for a before-time when our immigration laws were so permissive that we let in Nazi scientists who had once helped murder our own countrymen so we could put a man on the moon before our communist rival.
In a way, 10:29 and 11:43 are proving these doomsayers right: a country once morally strong and cohesive enough to reform Nazis into productive members of society is now frightened of an “invasion” from children.
Oh yeah. Aaron Ford wants to protect their ability to purchase their own insurance. Totes the same things as the government paying for their healthcare.
re: Ford, DACA children.
Missing the obvious. DACA became law in 2012 for children living continuously in the US since 2007. It appears that these “children” are now adults.
DACA was an overt attempt to buy votes. Period.
But if, as I understand Ford’s efforts, the DACA “children” will have to pay for their health insurance policy. I don’t see a problem.
@1:21. Our country is subsidized by immigrants. We need them to sustain our standard of living in all places in our economy (from CEOs to maintenance workers). America’s population is in decline.
@1:28, our country is subsidized by immigrants? While I agree that population decline is a concern, I don’t think importing millions of hostile third world people into our country is a solution.
You want to solve population decline? Total ban on abortion. Total ban on birth control. Total ban on LGBT propaganda directed at youth or in public. Policies that promote nationalism and family values. That will solve population decline, without turning our beautiful nation into Sierra Leon.
You sound like a nut job. Seriously. The overwhelming majority of immigrants are here trying to make a better life for them and their families. Your use of the term “millions of hostile third world people” exposes you as the nationalist trash that you are.
@2:43 I don’t care what they are here trying to do. I don’t care that many of them are good people. This is our nation, not theirs. That’s not an offensive statement.
And the ridiculous nonsense that total bans on abortion and birth control “support family values” and “solve population decline.” What a whack job. I sure hope the person with that type of reasoning isn’t a lawyer.
There is no serious debate over the “subsidization” question. Y’all realize that immigration – legal or otherwise – is the reason the United States isn’t in the same demographic tailspin as China, Russia, India, Mexico, Western Europe, or South America, which in turn provides us a more stable tax base and long-term competitive economic advantage over our rivals, which in turn might be enough to allow us to continue to be the world’s predominant economic power without the necessity of fighting a war with other nuclear-armed countries? And y’all realize that the massive shift in our own population from rural to urban living and from self-employment to employee status over the past century makes it basically impossible to reverse our own native demographic decline, even if we outlawed all forms of birth control? And y’all seriously believe lawful immigration will continue at the current numbers after we engage in mass deportations, when those immigrants can just as easily go to Western Europe, Canada, or Australia and know they’ll receive better treatment there? And finally, most importantly, y’all think the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency – which allows us to borrow money into oblivion and sustain a lifestyle we can’t afford on our own without massive wealth redistribution – is carved in stone for all time?
Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, we aren’t actually the ones subsidizing immigrants. In more fundamental and important ways, immigrants are subsidizing us. And after we drive them out, the folks in favor of these draconian policy shifts are going to learn some very hard lessons about how important these “illegals” were to our standard of living.
The entire country is subsidized by tax dollars. That’s literally what tax dollars are for. It takes a complete tool to complain about “mah tax dollars” only when they disagree politically with the recipient.
@1:18 “DACA was an overt attempt to buy votes.” Are you this paranoid all of the time? Perhaps it’s time to seek help. First, DACA recipients can’t (and don’t) vote. Second, America’s population is in decline. We need immigrants to maintain our standard of living. Finally, racism is a horrible affliction. Do better.
You are the fool here. A million humans come over the border and settle in California, what happens when the good old census comes around. . . . . yes, the Dems have always been great at playing the long con.
@1:25 Vote buying
Yep, buying votes from people like you at the time enacted. Potential voters from those now here illegally when people like you push for amnesty.
As to racism, I suspect you paint that picture in your mind everywhere.
As to declining population and economy. Most, nearly all of the millions of recent illegals have no skills. They will however need jobs, and will be competing with Americans for service jobs. There will be those being paid under the table. Perhaps not for the casinos, but certainly for pizza shops, privately owned restaurants, manicurist, laborers, construction.
Project 2025 outlines a number of policy platforms designed to strengthen the interconnectedness of religion and government. The concept of a debt jubilee is outlined in several books of the Old Testament and codified into the laws of the theocratic regimes that dominated that region of the world.
If the ancient kingdoms of the Levant were okay with bestowing the blessing of liberty on their Hebrew slaves every seven years, is it really such a stretch to user the concept of jubilee to grant amnesty to these “illegals”?
Come on Project 2025, show us what the “proper role of government” should be.
The Old Testament is only useful in law when weaponized.
Guest
Anonymous
January 16, 2025 10:57 am
Where do you recommend as a place to have lunch with a client as close to the courthouse as possible where we can reasonably expect to be able to talk about our case without having eavesdroppers? I don’t need you to tell me that best practice is to only talk in private, do it at my office, etc. I know all that. I’m just looking for honest answers to my question. Please spare me and the blog anything else. And in a second FU to 10:29, mil gracias.
During several trials I have used Cappriottis at the courthouse during lunch breaks. The dining area is really large and there is a back area where you can have some privacy.
If you’re going that far, you might as well go to the diner inside Binions or the Hawaiian place in the California. Unfortunately, Dupars is no longer on Fremont Street.
The lack of almost any decent restaurants immediately surrounding the courthouse is baffling. I hate having to pick between Capriottis, that pizza place and that grill. None are bad, but none are great.
Sin City Seafood Kitchen+Lounge is really good, and great prices as well. Went there a few times over the course of a 2- to 3-week trial in the last year, and we’re talking 10-12 dollar lunches that actually were really good.
Magnolia’s Veranda at the Four Queens. I don’t eat like I used to but the food at the George has gotten a bit fringe for my old school tastes. Especially after the lemon chicken was cut. A shortage of elegant luncheon venues has always been a bit of a problem in Las Vegas, but for downtown, I suggest the Veranda.
I do Capriottis because I work through lunch during trial but lets be honest: full of eavesdropping and I am kinda deaf to how loud I am. Better option is Golden Nugget
Guest
Anonymous
January 17, 2025 8:51 am
I don’t know how we have ended up with so many criminal practitioners in positions of power in civil practice, but it’s gone too far. There are too many PD’s/ADA’s presiding over significant civil matters. Then there’s the situation at the Office of Bar Counsel where DH has zero civil/private practice experience. I don’t think he’s a bad guy, but his inexperience hurts the bar.
The answer at the OBC is pretty simple. Tracks back to Hardesty wanting David Clark out (had civil experience before going to OBC) and wanting prosecutors in the office. Brought Brian Kunzi in fresh off of being the DA in Nye County to be OBC in Waiting and then took out David Clark.
Hardesty determined quickly that Kunzi was not hard enough and had him removed quickly. Brian ended up taking an administrative post as Director of Admissions inside of the SBN while SBN brought in Big Bad Stan who was given express instructions to treat the OBC like Operation Strike Force. Stan was Hardesty’s henchman by order. When Stan was on his way out, the OBC had the chance to elevate Janeen Isaacson who had civil experience and skipped over her for this DA from Lincoln County who had (a) no civil experience and (b) no bar/professional regulation experience.
The judiciary, profession and state is better off with Hardesty in retirement. He was arrogant, overbearing and vindictive.
Guest
Anonymous
January 17, 2025 9:49 am
Commissioner Fontano has HAD IT with people leaving their mics open. I don’t blame him. The probate zoom is chaos every week, multiple mics left open for us to hear conversations while he is trying to conduct court.
Isn’t there a ‘mute all’ button for the meeting organizer? Just pause, mute everyone and the person who is supposed to be speaking can unmute themselves. It’s a kludge but it works.
Yes and for whatever reason probate is the only department that has everyone’s mics on by default when you join, instead of the opposite. Then they wonder why it is chaos
Good for Ford on this one. Those kids deserve healthcare. I criticize him in other grounds, but here he’s right.
You’re right bro. It’s our moral obligation to pay for the healthcare of our invaders!
“Invaders”. You’re exactly what’s wrong with the USA right now. FOAD.
Yes, because the illegal border jumpers moved by cartels are NOT the problem. Just the people that want our borders secure and our immigration laws enforced.
You sir are the fucking problem
I can’t speak for the dreamers but when I was a child I had plenty of “invasion” plans, although they were much more limited in scope – typically involved my plastic toy army against a friend’s plastic toy army, or capturing another kid’s flag, etc.
If 10:29 is right, then the USA finds itself with a population of foreign children capable of planning a coordinated effort to (1) raise funds to pay for an illegal border crossing, (2) work out the logistics of the journey, and (3) successfully lobby a state government to arrange for healthcare funding. To say nothing of the grooming they did on their parents to convince them to leave their homes and jobs to make the journey.
If that’s so, then we need to give these kids healthcare not for “moral” reasons, but in the interests of self-preservation. Because if these toddlers can do all of this now, imagine how much more formidable they’ll be when they get a little older. We need to keep them on our side.
Creative and amusing but standards strawman changing all invaders into children then making satire re children. Still, good post.
11:25, tldr
Actually I did read it. And my response is who cares? Their parents were illegal so are children. Your appeal to moral authority is meaningless to someone who cares about MY country.
I truly do not care about the illegals’ children. Their parents are criminals ad initio in this country. I support the incoming administration’s policy to break-up families via deportation. There are consequences for sypathizers. If this is what it takes to deter illegal immigration so be it.
The Democrats obsession with identity politics and the Republicans inhumanity leave me as a political nomad. Is it too much to ask to have a party that is sane and humane? Apparently so.
You’re so special. Conservatism is the truest compassion bc it provides for self reliance.
Ah, yes, “self-reliance.” Tell me about how virtuous your work ethic is and imply that others with less have no one to blame but themselves. If only if they worked as hard as you!
How exactly did the Walton kids become “self reliant”? Are you excited to see how “self reliant” Jeff Bezos’ kids are? How about Elon Musk’s kids? Because for the rest of our natural lives, these nepo-babies are going to have an outweighted influence on our law, society and culture. FUN!
Obviously those illegal criminal babies should have chosen to be born in better circumstances.
Going to side tangent away from immigration and discuss this “self reliance” modern day conservatives love so much for a moment.
While I do agree self reliance is important and there are probably too many abuses in our welfare system, conservatism has gone too far and basically handed our country over to corporations in the name of “free market” and self reliance.
Conservatism used to be about government leaving the little guy alone. Now it just seems squarely aimed at corporate welfare for the millionaires and billionaires.
So I reject “self reliance” if what it looks like in practice is letting a man who has worked a blue collar job for 30 years to support his family die of cancer because he can’t afford treatment even though he has health insurance.
And that is why so many of us feel stuck in the middle. The democrats won’t stop with the constant identity politics long enough to actually pass bills to help people, and the republicans will let you starve and die in the name of “self reliance” if you’re not a millionaire.
There are no conservatives in the GOP anymore, if you haven’t noticed.
Yes. D = R and the Uniparty reigns, at least for now.
Get one single member of congress to drop a Constitutional Amendment for term limits today, in this political climate, and watch the fire get lit.
2 years ago 87% of Americans supported congressional term limits. Bet its even higher today.
87 fkg percent!!!
The real solution is to get rid of partisan primaries. Congresspersons have to pander to the craziest, most extreme people in the base in order to be nominated. In gerrymandered districts, the primary is effectively the general election.
That’s nonsense and solves nothing. I have no beef with 3rd and 4th parties. But as long as the Uniparty reigns we cant get politicians that actually WANT to serve the people. Retroactive Term limits (turnover) is the start.
Very much like whats happening with our judges and a certain “judgemaker” that holds the keys to the kingdom, as it were.
Nice try troll. If I’m arrested for dui with my children don’t they take them to cps and separate us?
You must not have a child or spouse or soul and or all the above.
GTFOH! Break the law and go to jail (or get deported) separation is inherent in the system. I know plenty of accused lawbreakers that get separated for a myriad of arbitrary reasons and they don’t bitch about it.
Likewise, there are no hearts bleeding for them in any event. I am betting that you shed no tears for Rob Graham’s wife, kids or soul.
@11:43 human beings aren’t illegal
Humans DO illegal shit all the time. Keep your nonsense cliches to yourself.
11:43, are you implying that America has no moral center or grounding, or that morality and country are fundamentally at odds with each other?
To be sure, there’s a lot of talk nowadays about how America is broken, and a lot of yearning for a before-time when our immigration laws were so permissive that we let in Nazi scientists who had once helped murder our own countrymen so we could put a man on the moon before our communist rival.
In a way, 10:29 and 11:43 are proving these doomsayers right: a country once morally strong and cohesive enough to reform Nazis into productive members of society is now frightened of an “invasion” from children.
U lost the election. Go away.
Harsh, but I just learned a new acronym, so …
Oh yeah. Aaron Ford wants to protect their ability to purchase their own insurance. Totes the same things as the government paying for their healthcare.
re: Ford, DACA children.
Missing the obvious. DACA became law in 2012 for children living continuously in the US since 2007. It appears that these “children” are now adults.
DACA was an overt attempt to buy votes. Period.
But if, as I understand Ford’s efforts, the DACA “children” will have to pay for their health insurance policy. I don’t see a problem.
The policies are subsidized by tax dollars, so even if they are paying something they aren’t paying for it fully.
@1:21. Our country is subsidized by immigrants. We need them to sustain our standard of living in all places in our economy (from CEOs to maintenance workers). America’s population is in decline.
@1:28, our country is subsidized by immigrants? While I agree that population decline is a concern, I don’t think importing millions of hostile third world people into our country is a solution.
You want to solve population decline? Total ban on abortion. Total ban on birth control. Total ban on LGBT propaganda directed at youth or in public. Policies that promote nationalism and family values. That will solve population decline, without turning our beautiful nation into Sierra Leon.
You sound like a nut job. Seriously. The overwhelming majority of immigrants are here trying to make a better life for them and their families. Your use of the term “millions of hostile third world people” exposes you as the nationalist trash that you are.
. . . . . . and to provide the Democrat with votes.
no one who received DACA has any pathway to citizenship… so they literally cannot vote.
Please read your constitution. The sheer number of illegals in this country (as counted every census) constitutes the make up of our fair Congress.
How many seats and electoral votes would Cali really have without counting the illegals?
Sounds way worse to me than a “literal” vote.
@2:43 I don’t care what they are here trying to do. I don’t care that many of them are good people. This is our nation, not theirs. That’s not an offensive statement.
And the ridiculous nonsense that total bans on abortion and birth control “support family values” and “solve population decline.” What a whack job. I sure hope the person with that type of reasoning isn’t a lawyer.
There is no serious debate over the “subsidization” question. Y’all realize that immigration – legal or otherwise – is the reason the United States isn’t in the same demographic tailspin as China, Russia, India, Mexico, Western Europe, or South America, which in turn provides us a more stable tax base and long-term competitive economic advantage over our rivals, which in turn might be enough to allow us to continue to be the world’s predominant economic power without the necessity of fighting a war with other nuclear-armed countries? And y’all realize that the massive shift in our own population from rural to urban living and from self-employment to employee status over the past century makes it basically impossible to reverse our own native demographic decline, even if we outlawed all forms of birth control? And y’all seriously believe lawful immigration will continue at the current numbers after we engage in mass deportations, when those immigrants can just as easily go to Western Europe, Canada, or Australia and know they’ll receive better treatment there? And finally, most importantly, y’all think the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency – which allows us to borrow money into oblivion and sustain a lifestyle we can’t afford on our own without massive wealth redistribution – is carved in stone for all time?
Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, we aren’t actually the ones subsidizing immigrants. In more fundamental and important ways, immigrants are subsidizing us. And after we drive them out, the folks in favor of these draconian policy shifts are going to learn some very hard lessons about how important these “illegals” were to our standard of living.
All policies should be subsidized 100% by tax dollars – actually we just shouldn’t have policies we should just have health care.
The entire country is subsidized by tax dollars. That’s literally what tax dollars are for. It takes a complete tool to complain about “mah tax dollars” only when they disagree politically with the recipient.
@1:18 “DACA was an overt attempt to buy votes.” Are you this paranoid all of the time? Perhaps it’s time to seek help. First, DACA recipients can’t (and don’t) vote. Second, America’s population is in decline. We need immigrants to maintain our standard of living. Finally, racism is a horrible affliction. Do better.
Virtue signaling enablers are the real perpetrators keeping people down.
You are the fool here. A million humans come over the border and settle in California, what happens when the good old census comes around. . . . . yes, the Dems have always been great at playing the long con.
@1:25 Vote buying
Yep, buying votes from people like you at the time enacted. Potential voters from those now here illegally when people like you push for amnesty.
As to racism, I suspect you paint that picture in your mind everywhere.
As to declining population and economy. Most, nearly all of the millions of recent illegals have no skills. They will however need jobs, and will be competing with Americans for service jobs. There will be those being paid under the table. Perhaps not for the casinos, but certainly for pizza shops, privately owned restaurants, manicurist, laborers, construction.
Bestowing blessings is not the proper role of government.
Project 2025 outlines a number of policy platforms designed to strengthen the interconnectedness of religion and government. The concept of a debt jubilee is outlined in several books of the Old Testament and codified into the laws of the theocratic regimes that dominated that region of the world.
If the ancient kingdoms of the Levant were okay with bestowing the blessing of liberty on their Hebrew slaves every seven years, is it really such a stretch to user the concept of jubilee to grant amnesty to these “illegals”?
Come on Project 2025, show us what the “proper role of government” should be.
The Old Testament is only useful in law when weaponized.
Where do you recommend as a place to have lunch with a client as close to the courthouse as possible where we can reasonably expect to be able to talk about our case without having eavesdroppers? I don’t need you to tell me that best practice is to only talk in private, do it at my office, etc. I know all that. I’m just looking for honest answers to my question. Please spare me and the blog anything else. And in a second FU to 10:29, mil gracias.
Triple George is a bit of a walk, but it’s got booths.
The Greek place on Lewis, just to the north of the courthouse, is close and there’s a room in the back that is semi-private.
They used to have valet parking.
Ameribrunch.
I miss courthouse cafe
I do too, but at the end it was quite awful.
I missed the OJ special there during the OJ trial. Lunch with a side of two joined onion rings and a glass of OJ was a fun lunch.
How bout u go to Tijuana and have some of that good food in support of those good non-invaders.
Huh? Good grief…
11:21 AM, you’re gonna be PISSED when you learn about the history of Tacos El Gordo.
Ellos están aquà y son deliciosos!
During several trials I have used Cappriottis at the courthouse during lunch breaks. The dining area is really large and there is a back area where you can have some privacy.
Chik fil a at the golden nugget.
If you’re going that far, you might as well go to the diner inside Binions or the Hawaiian place in the California. Unfortunately, Dupars is no longer on Fremont Street.
The lack of almost any decent restaurants immediately surrounding the courthouse is baffling. I hate having to pick between Capriottis, that pizza place and that grill. None are bad, but none are great.
I always thought a panda express would kill it down here during lunch
Didn’t there used to be an off brand panda express across the street? Am I imagining that?
There are restaurants at the Golden Nugget, a short walk.
Sin City Seafood Kitchen+Lounge and Greens and Protein, both in the ground level of the Juhl Condos on 3rd and Bonneville.
Starbucks off Center Blvd.
I’m pretty sure Sin City Seafood closed.
Sin City Seafood Kitchen+Lounge is really good, and great prices as well. Went there a few times over the course of a 2- to 3-week trial in the last year, and we’re talking 10-12 dollar lunches that actually were really good.
Magnolia’s Veranda at the Four Queens. I don’t eat like I used to but the food at the George has gotten a bit fringe for my old school tastes. Especially after the lemon chicken was cut. A shortage of elegant luncheon venues has always been a bit of a problem in Las Vegas, but for downtown, I suggest the Veranda.
Always good to get a comment from the Shark Pimp! Hope you are doing well, Jordan!
Kind of you to ask. Many thanks.
Arts district isn’t far
I do Capriottis because I work through lunch during trial but lets be honest: full of eavesdropping and I am kinda deaf to how loud I am. Better option is Golden Nugget
I don’t know how we have ended up with so many criminal practitioners in positions of power in civil practice, but it’s gone too far. There are too many PD’s/ADA’s presiding over significant civil matters. Then there’s the situation at the Office of Bar Counsel where DH has zero civil/private practice experience. I don’t think he’s a bad guy, but his inexperience hurts the bar.
The answer at the OBC is pretty simple. Tracks back to Hardesty wanting David Clark out (had civil experience before going to OBC) and wanting prosecutors in the office. Brought Brian Kunzi in fresh off of being the DA in Nye County to be OBC in Waiting and then took out David Clark.
https://pvtimes.com/news/former-da-kunzi-lands-spot-with-state-bar/
Hardesty determined quickly that Kunzi was not hard enough and had him removed quickly. Brian ended up taking an administrative post as Director of Admissions inside of the SBN while SBN brought in Big Bad Stan who was given express instructions to treat the OBC like Operation Strike Force. Stan was Hardesty’s henchman by order. When Stan was on his way out, the OBC had the chance to elevate Janeen Isaacson who had civil experience and skipped over her for this DA from Lincoln County who had (a) no civil experience and (b) no bar/professional regulation experience.
The judiciary, profession and state is better off with Hardesty in retirement. He was arrogant, overbearing and vindictive.
Commissioner Fontano has HAD IT with people leaving their mics open. I don’t blame him. The probate zoom is chaos every week, multiple mics left open for us to hear conversations while he is trying to conduct court.
Isn’t there a ‘mute all’ button for the meeting organizer? Just pause, mute everyone and the person who is supposed to be speaking can unmute themselves. It’s a kludge but it works.
Yes and for whatever reason probate is the only department that has everyone’s mics on by default when you join, instead of the opposite. Then they wonder why it is chaos