- law dawg
- 88 Comments
- 3551 Views
- Analysis: ICE arrests are surging in Nevada–including of people with no criminal record. [TNI]
- Former Henderson police chief defends record: “I would never cover up a DUI.” [RJ]
- AG Ford “formally” launches bid for governor. [News3LV; RJ]
The First of the First
Thanks, ICE!
Yes! The Shield and Sword of the Trumplickin’ Party. Our Stasi.
I can’t even fathom these liberals who cheer on their invaders. This land is ours, taken by our ancestors. We must defend it. B&S!
B&S is short for “Blood and Soil,” a key slogan of Naziism. 10:22 is unequivocally and shamelessly spreading Nazi ideology.
Personally, my ancestors were immigrants who killed Nazis.
I would prefer to think that 10:22 is satirizing Nazi assholes who support ICE with their full chest, and that the inclusion of B&S (and the over-the-top phrasing) was meant to signal that. Maybe I’m just pollyanna-ing.
without all the hype
If you entered illegally you are subject to deportation.
Why so narrow-minded? Under this regime, if you entered legally, you are subject to rendition. If you were born here, you are subject to rendition.
2:22 this blog is for lawyers. Please go post somewhere else better suited to your posts
So, as a lawyer, you should be aware of the arguments advanced by this regime. If you were born here, but the regime doesn’t like your parents, you are subject to rendition. That’s an actual argument they are trying to make.
I thought it meant Bull & Shit.
I thought it meant BS which is what that kind of thinking is. My father flew over Nazi Germany as an 18 year old, bombing train tracks and factories to stop Hitler, not to applaud the jerk
My grandfather killed Nazis in North Africa and Italy. My great uncle killed Nazis on Omaha Beach and France. Nothing would make me happier than to continue the family tradition right here in America.
Heck yes! We stole it from Native Americans! How dare anyone else ask for a path to citizenship!
The fact we can’t tell if this is satire says a lot about the blog’s usual crowd.
I don’t think the problem is really the blog’s usual crowd. I think there is a handful of kooks, mostly non-lawyers, that make it seem that way.
Not political and not particularly interested in immigration policy. I will observe how hilarious it is seeing the Ruby Ridge, Waco, Bundy crowd suddenly loving the federal police. Same police that raided Mar A Lago. Must be an interesting mental pretzel.
Do people really not understand the difference between settlers and immigrants. We are not a nation of immigrants. We are a nation first of settlers.
Who stole the land.
Oh stop the nonsense. The native americans stole land, held slaves and killed other tribes, while remaining aboriginal.
Settlers whose families came (before and after the Revolution) as emigrants who became immigrants.
What is really sad is how bad of an employee you must be to lose your job to someone who doesn’t speak English, has no education, has no connections and is supposedly lazy. Maybe it is time to look in the mirror and realize you don’t like capitalism and prefer to be a socialist since you can’t hack it in a competitive world. Alternatively, blame corporate greed instead of someone trying to make a better life.
Citation fucking needed, chief.
In the 1940 Census, the most recently publicly one available, the US was 89% white. Of those, 10% were born somewhere else. This is 1940, not 1880. Did people settle here? Sure. Many times, they were invited and induced to emigrate. See the German Russian immigration, for example, who settled the heartland and farmed. But did people keep coming here long after the “settlements” were established? Absolutely.
Don’t call me chief, pal.
Don’t call me pal, buddy.
Don’t call me buddy, friend.
Don’t call me friend, Ace.
Surely, we can all get along.
Immigration before the welfare state was the opposite of what it is today. Must I spell it out?
Please spell it out.
Were people already living on and using the land before the “settlements” were established? Absolutely.
Get over it.
Such a tired ass argument.
I bet you bitch like that when presented with a fact in court, too.
In 1920 the us population was approx 95 million. Half were not “Colonial Stock” as determined by the 70th congress. There were 14 Million Immigrants (15%) , 19 Million Children of Immigrants (20%) and 20.6 (22%) Grand children of Immigrants.
In 2023, there were 47.8 million immigrants residing in the US.
Its a complex issue. Changes like tightening the border in the 1970s and 1980s in the drug war meant than many workers (at times promoted by the US govt) couldn’t cross the border and then go back home. They then brought their families with them.
Cry harder, sis
The settlers v immigrants is a non-sensical debate. The only ones who could likely be considered “settlers” are those that came in the 1600s. What exactly is the difference legally and why does it matter. Its seems like primarily a racist dog whistle.
I refuse to believe these pro-ICE/anti-fundamental rights people are sincere or sincerely attorneys. More likely they are (1) veterans in politics types, (2) legal support staff who tend to be more populist, but lack a deep and nuanced understanding of law, policy, history, or the economy, or (3) these posts are rage-bate (intentionally posting inflammatory takes) to increase attention to this matter or traffic to this blog. Whomever is posting these posts re: ICE is not using his brain, which is not unprecedented among attorneys, but to persist in this idiocy is particularly strange for someone allegedly highly educated.
Clown
Sir, you have proved the point.
Gunfire erupted a Reno’s Grand Sierra Hotel and Casino on Monday with multiple people hurt before police captured the alleged gunman, authorities said. 2 dead.
The incident began outside, near the valet area, and no one inside the casino was harmed, police said.
Awful.
In need of a real estate attorney recommendation.
Jeff Zucker
check out the Chambers Listing. It is surprisingly good. https://chambers.com/legal-rankings/real-estate-nevada-5:11:12799:1?l=en-GB
Need more context. Transactional or litigation, residential or commercial/industrial at the very least.
For an SRPD non-disclosure claim? For a title insurance claim? For a partition action? For a breach of contract on agreements of the purchase agreements? to get out of a listing agreement? To review a construction financing contract? To get the EMD back on a builder purchase contract (good luck)? For litigation on a property line dispute? Do you have any more details? I’m asking because, for example, I do a lot of real estate cases but about 3/4 of these, and I know attorneys who only do one of these and some that do 5 of them.
Happy to help but as indicated: far too broad. Furthermore there are attorneys who review SRPDs and there are attorneys at LV versions of BIGLAW who put together land assemblages. Not the same lawyers.
Looks like the person who actually admitted to trying out a VPN for purposes of being able to flood comments with “fake” thumbs ups/downs is VPN-ing 😀😀
Maybe you just made a bad post lol
3:47 here, I’m sure I did but on this, I’m not talking about my posts.
No. I am not. But, someone is.
“Analysis: ICE arrests are surging in Nevada–including of people with no criminal record.” This is 100% false. Everyone being arrested by ICE committed a crime the second their foot touched US soil. The left and media try to spin that as being okay because they were coming here looking for a better life. However, they still broke the law and, as such, are subject to being arrested by ICE. ICE isn’t arresting innocent people.
4:21 PM, when you post something like that, do you really expect people to believe that you are an attorney? Be honest.
Believe it or not, they are lawyers. Law school is full of these FedSoc weirdos who confidently interrupt class to shout about their far right legal “theories” and very few law professors have the nerve to tell them to shut the fuck up and stop being an idiot. Then, they go and complain about being “thought minorities” and other such nonsense. No, they are real and we are doomed.
Yes you are!
Blah blah, fucking blah!
“If you don’t agree with me you are not an attorney. If you believe in prosecuting and deporting people that are in this country in violation of the law, you are not an attorney and if by God, you support DJT you CANNOT be an attorney.”
So sick and tired of this banal, nonsensical absolutism. Did you learn nothing about analysis and argument tactics in law school? I learned this shit in Philosophy 102 in fucking undergrad.
It’s crazy that you made it to Philosophy 102 without any demonstrable reading comprehension skills.
It is fucking crazy to be on a legal blog posting so confidently and **so** incorrectly about the law. God help your “clients.”
I really, really hope 4:21 is engaging in satire. If not, Dunning-Kruger all day. If you’re not greatly, greatly confused about the difference between criminal and civil/admin law maybe put an /s/ at end. Lol.
“bUt We CaLl ThEm IlLeGaLz, iT mUsT bE BeCaUsE tHeIr IlLeGaL!!!!1!”
You people get off on WELL AKSHUALLY ITS A CIVIL OFFENSE. What’s the remedy for this civil offense? Deportation. Cry more, I’ll continue enjoying reading these articles about ICE deporting illegal aliens
“Everyone being arrested by ICE committed a crime the second their foot touched US soil.” It doesn’t seem unreasonable to point out how inaccurate that sounds to anyone who is actually an attorney. You cry more, person who obviously isn’t from around here. And tell the poor dears who are too scared to show their faces (like every other LEO does 24/7) to the short order cooks they’re detaining to go back to wherever they’re from to. States’ blah blah, except, blah blah
. . . . . said the non-attorney that doesn’t want to be bothered to even look it up.
We didn’t say it’s not subject to deportation but for the love of god stop bleating that it’s a CRIME and they are CRIMINALS. You’re just flat wrong. And after you get called out on that then you try to pooh pooh it as though the very thing you keep incorrectly screaming is some unimportant technical detail.
FALSE
Try researching the actual criminal implications of entering the country illegally.
There are criminal sanctions as well as civil and you, sis, are just plain wrong.
Try this:
8 USC §1325 and 1326
18 USC §1546
for starters.
These are crimes and not civil in nature.
Sigh…we went over this last week but apparently we need to say it again. Coming here “illegally” is a CIVIL offense, not a criminal offense. Hence, not a crime. Are you able to comprehend that? I’m not saying they are not subject to being detailed/deported but for crying out loud, stop falsely bleating that it’s a “crime.”
Take your meds, I’m not the person you are referring to. I’m not even 4:21
LOL then you’re not the person I’m talking to. Wtf…
Well you started talking to me dipshit
You had trouble on those logic puzzles on the LSAT, eh? Assuming you’re a lawyer that is
Wait what? § 1325 is a misdemeanor (Illegal entry into US) – while not a felony it most certainly is a crime (like speeding). If someone was previously deported and comes back again – it’s a whole ass felony – 8 U.S.C. § 1326,
And you are a lawyer?
Overstaying visa is not a criminal offense – but crossing the border illegal is absolutely criminal wtf
Not OP. But what about the blanket term “everyone” would make you question whether these responses are from lawyers 7:25? It’s incredibly inaccurate. Are you a lawyer? You contradict yourself in your own post.
There is a distinction between entering illegally and being present without lawful authorization. Most who are deported entered lawfully but remained past their lawful authorization. The former (unlawful entry) is a crime; the latter is not.
Do you know where the felony comes in?
18 USC §1546.
I challenge you to find an illegal alien that does not misuse an identification document (for gaining employment or otherwise) that is not false or belongs to someone else.
Felony.
Also making a false statement on an asylum application.
Felony.
They’re fucking criminals and you are a liar and phony with this “its a civil offense” bullshit. You might be a lawyer, but you clearly suck at it.
My, how far afield we’re getting from “just being here makes them criminal illegals.”
And how does one “misuse an identification document . . . that is not false” (i.e. true)?
FALSE
Folks, stop taking the rage-bait. There are more important things to argue about.
Anyone have a case that is a good example of converting a set aside proceeding to a general administration? Thanks. Back to your immigration posts.
Just file a petition to do just that. Explain what the character and assets of the estate are and ask that the administrator be appointed. Be prepared to acount for any assets previously distributed.
Who is the best immigration attorney in town? No lazy hacks please, someone actually effective.
Stephen miller
What type of issue? Asylum? Visa? Employment based? EB-5?
I generally refer immigration matters to Margo Chernysheva (immigrationlawnv dot com) – most of my inquiries (due to my practice area) are not asylum or criminal law oriented. Usually the employment/investment ones – but I believe she does pretty much all of it.
Darren Heyman.
I find it funny that a large swath of the people posting on this blog accuse others of not being an attorney because they disagree with their politics.
I think it’s just one guy. Graduating in the bottom of his class at a shit tier law school and passing the bar on his multiple attempt is the greatest accomplishment of his life
Boyd ’13 “practicing” ID and making $105k per year.
Having not been content with imposing a manifestly unqualified Interim US Attorney on Nevada, and having been unable to get her confirmed by a Senate that is willing to confirm a Republican ham sandwich, Trump now illegally seeks to continue to force this person on Nevada by pretending she’s the Acting US Attorney.
Sorry, President Dumbass. The US Attorney is appointed as Congress determines under Article I. It’s not an Article II issue.