Judge Nancy Bernstein sues the estate of Joseph Houston, as well as Dylan Houston and Katherine Houston alleging civil conspiracy and wrongful death. [RJ; News3LV]
Tourist must remain in town after flamingo incident. [8NewsNow; RJ]
Nevada among states to reject Live Nation settlement in illegal monopoly case. [RJ]
Zach Conine files for AG, setting up Democratic primary battle against Nicole Cannizzaro. [KTNV]
Opinion: Nevada is ready to lead on school zone safety–federal lawmakers hold the key. [NV Current]
Lawsuit: ICE detainee in Nevada loses eyes in psychotic episode after being denied meds. [TNI]
Same here. I made it through about 10 minutes and just could not continue it. I’ve gone back a few times and watched another 2-3 minutes but still – nope, can’t do it.
It alleges that Dylan Houston left threatening messages for Ashley and wrote to Dennis Prince in an email four days before the shooting, “you have no idea what’s coming do you, all your cards are on the table and I haven’t played one.”
The suit also cites Katherine Houston’s behavior after the shooting, saying she left the room without talking to Joe Houston or checking on the Princes, and she did not return to the room at any point. She also transferred multiple properties into her name about two weeks later. YUCK!!
Look Joe murdered people. Dylan acted atrociously prior to the deposition. But Katherine just watched her husband pull out a gun and murder people and fled from the room with the court reporter and Shannon Wilson and with her attorney all fleeing to safety. Nobody and I mean NOBODY benevolently returns unarmed to the scene of an active shooter.
Sorry if you want to go after Katherine for fraudulent transfer, fine (although I suspect that the properties were held in joint tenancy and transferred upon death as opposed to being fraudulent transfers). But this narrative that you would do anything other than run is ridiculous.
Wouldn’t her leaving the room after the shooting and not talking to Joe support the conclusion she didn’t know about it? Had she known what was about to happen, why would she have needed to run? And, wouldn’t the property transfers look more suspicious if they’d been done before the shooting. I am in no way trying to help the defense here, but I’m not seeing the connection on these points to supposed guilt.
There needs to be accountability here, and I hope they can unwind the (apparently) fraudulent conveyances of property. Even if the money recovered turns out to be negligible, this is worth doing if the allegations are correct.
Huh? I hope Nancy Epstein gets hit with Rule 11 sanctions for bringing frivolous claims against Dylan’s law firm and a mother because she transferred property after the incident. Like in what world does that create some sort of conspiracy? Sometimes I think PI attorneys forget that by filing a complaint they are representing to the court that “the factual contentions have evidentiary support.”
I know what I think you were going at…. They sued Joe’s firm because Joe was arguably within the course and scope of his lawyerly duties (even though he acted completely outside the scope of his lawyerly duties).
Guest
Anonymous
March 11, 2026 12:43 pm
“‘I’ve been a lawyer [since 2015], and as a lawyer what we’ve done is solve problems,’ [Conine] said.” (First bracket in original).
What did Conine actually say before Sebelius editorially altered the quote?
RIP Marc Gordon
https://obituaries.reviewjournal.com/obituary/marc-gordon-1093582651
Re: Strip Law. They pronounce Nevada incorrectly, so I instinctively HATE it.
Do they prounounce it “levio-SAH” or “levi-OH-sah?”
They pronounce it “Adele Dazeem”
“The Hammer” on Lifetime had Reba, whose character grew up in Tonopah, say Ne-VAH–duh…
Strip Law looks uninteresting, like a very low effort production. Will not even give it a single episode of my time.
It IS uninteresting with low effort production. Couldn’t even finish the first episode.
Same here. I made it through about 10 minutes and just could not continue it. I’ve gone back a few times and watched another 2-3 minutes but still – nope, can’t do it.
Never heard of it till today and watched the linked trailer. It looks stupid. No thanks.
Hope the Houston family get what they deserve
It alleges that Dylan Houston left threatening messages for Ashley and wrote to Dennis Prince in an email four days before the shooting, “you have no idea what’s coming do you, all your cards are on the table and I haven’t played one.”
The suit also cites Katherine Houston’s behavior after the shooting, saying she left the room without talking to Joe Houston or checking on the Princes, and she did not return to the room at any point. She also transferred multiple properties into her name about two weeks later. YUCK!!
Look Joe murdered people. Dylan acted atrociously prior to the deposition. But Katherine just watched her husband pull out a gun and murder people and fled from the room with the court reporter and Shannon Wilson and with her attorney all fleeing to safety. Nobody and I mean NOBODY benevolently returns unarmed to the scene of an active shooter.
Sorry if you want to go after Katherine for fraudulent transfer, fine (although I suspect that the properties were held in joint tenancy and transferred upon death as opposed to being fraudulent transfers). But this narrative that you would do anything other than run is ridiculous.
Wouldn’t her leaving the room after the shooting and not talking to Joe support the conclusion she didn’t know about it? Had she known what was about to happen, why would she have needed to run? And, wouldn’t the property transfers look more suspicious if they’d been done before the shooting. I am in no way trying to help the defense here, but I’m not seeing the connection on these points to supposed guilt.
There needs to be accountability here, and I hope they can unwind the (apparently) fraudulent conveyances of property. Even if the money recovered turns out to be negligible, this is worth doing if the allegations are correct.
Huh? I hope Nancy Epstein gets hit with Rule 11 sanctions for bringing frivolous claims against Dylan’s law firm and a mother because she transferred property after the incident. Like in what world does that create some sort of conspiracy? Sometimes I think PI attorneys forget that by filing a complaint they are representing to the court that “the factual contentions have evidentiary support.”
The firm where Dylan was employed at the time (and still is listed on the SBN website but not the firm website) is not named as a defendant.
I know what I think you were going at…. They sued Joe’s firm because Joe was arguably within the course and scope of his lawyerly duties (even though he acted completely outside the scope of his lawyerly duties).
“‘I’ve been a lawyer [since 2015], and as a lawyer what we’ve done is solve problems,’ [Conine] said.” (First bracket in original).
What did Conine actually say before Sebelius editorially altered the quote?