- Quickdraw McLaw
- 48 Comments
- 94 Views
- Governor Sisolak has issued another directive addressing golf courses and religious gatherings (tacitly including Passover seders and Easter dinners), as well as haircuts and bulk foods. [TNI]
- The US had 6.6 million unemployment claims filed last week, meaning at least 1 in 10 workers is without a job right now. CNBC]
- Nevada had another 80,000 bringing the coronavirus job loss total here to 245,000, so far… [Las Vegas Sun]
- The Nevada Independent is launching a judicial races project. Did they help or hurt the credibility of the project by involving Dean Dan Hamilton? [TNI]
- Dad’s lawsuit says hospital failed to protect son killed by mom. [RJ]
- For those of you so inclined, one of our readers wants you to know that tomorrow will be a worldwide day of unity and fasting.
Looks like our esteemed Governor got caught hoarding hydroxychloroquine after restricting access to it.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/04/04/nevada-governor-found-hoarding-hydroxychloroquine-after-restricting-access-to-the-drug-n2566360
Even Chuck Muth who is anti-Sisolak says this story is false.
http://www.muthstruths.com/did-gov-sisolak-really-hoard-hydroxychloroquine-for-prisoners/
Unbelievable that a drug that is saving lives has been banned by the Governor.
Is it saving lives?
How come Spicy Sisolack didn't order OJ Simpson to be permanently deported back to California instead of closing ALL golf courses?
He was golfing at the Anthem Golf course, where only the disposable to management work.
Can anyone on here comment on the constitutionality of Sisolak's ban on religious gatherings? Since this explicitly targets a suspect class (religion) wouldn't this have to pass strict scrutiny (compelling interest and narrowly tailored)? Perhaps it meets the compelling interest test given the pandemic but it is hard to see how it the most narrow possible way to accomplish the government's purpose. I wonder if this aspect of the order will be challenged.
He didn't ban religious gatherings altogether. He applied the same standard to religious gatherings as everything else: no more than 10 people.
This seems narrowly tailored to me.
Neutral, generally applicable laws are not unconstitutional merely because they regulate religious conduct
What 8:43 said. And even if strict scrutiny applies, this is a compelling interest and I don't see a better less broad way to accomplish that interest. It would pass strict scrutiny.
Did the Nevada congressional delegation drop the ball by excluding legal gambling businesses with less than 500 employees to be excluded from PPP program?
13CFR110(g) excludes "Businesses deriving more than one-third of gross annual revenue from legal gambling activities."
I've heard this exclusion is being interpreted to exclude smaller vendors to Casinos, gaming bars, etc.
Yes, ball dropped. A long-time locals casino client of mind isn't happy.
I see we have a decision in Machine (War) vs. State. Mr. Machine did not prevail.
War Machine always prevails. Did E. Cadish preside over it?
Over the trial, yes; she was not on the appeal panel.
I'm upset, that OJ is upset, that the golf courses are closed.
Don't squeeze or bruise the juice. Juice is trying to get in some golf time during a pandemic, and steal some good old NV cox cable before he gets out Wahoo Fish Taco to wear a Heidi Almase campaign sticker before he is picked on the Wahoo fishing trawler by Deputy Sheriff, I mean Constable Jordan Ross.
Post of the month…
Yes, indeed. Wins award hands down for the post with the most words written successively while still being utterly unintelligible.
Chuckle worthy, but yes, the grammar suggests the writer had a few too many Bloody Mary's for lunch… or was that breakfast?
Wow, we are grammar checking jokes? Sad.
4:58 in the morning, and you are criticizing blog posts? Get some sleep.
Will admit I thought the idea from the NVIndy sounded neat until I got to the Dean Hamilton part. Ugh.
Elaborate, please.
Every move Dean Wormer makes is the wrong move. Isn't he the "no talent a** clown" pushing for a uniform bar exam and allowing non-attorneys to practice law. How about Nevada rolls out the red carpet for 6 more Sam & Ash California carpetbaggers.
I definitely want to support Eglet, so Bonnie Bulla's campaign gets the much needed money she needs from him.
Boyd law students evaluating the submissions of Boyd grads running for district court? No conflict there . . .
This comment has been removed by the author.
https://law.unlv.edu/sites/default/files/faculty/resumes/Hamilton%20CV%209.16.15.pdf
Dan Hamilton has never practiced law in Nevada. In fact, it looks like he's never practiced at all. Why should a guy who's never argued a motion, never drafted interrogatories, never taken a deposition or ever taken a matter to trial be involved in such an endeavor, much less helping to lead it?
Agreed. It needs to be a cross-section of practicing litigators. Prosecution and defense, Civil plaintiff, defense, and commercial. Family practitioners only for those slots. Who cares what some academic who has never practiced thinks?
1:15 PM here.
Dan Hamilton may not have the wisdom and experience that can only come from practice, but he could provide value to this project the more I think about it. He has the ability to marshal free labor in the form of law students. He also can lend the credibility of his title (the general public probably assumes that he has distinguished experience practicing law). I wonder if Jon Ralston understands that Hamilton has no experience. Maybe he does and doesn't care. As long as Hamilton restrains himself, as described, his contribution could theoretically be helpful. I don't know him well enough to speculate about whether he would, or whether he would want to wade into the x's and o's of the evaluation process.
Ah ha – I finally see the pattern – it's a paternalistic, protect the females rule we abide by here – It's perfectly OK to call a male a "no talent a** clown" – it's acceptable for work, is not bullying, and not defamatory – I'm so bored at home right now that I went back and looked – although not scientific and certainly not comprehensive – it appears this blog is OK with "a** clown" comments but not re a female (see the comments a couple a weeks ago). To be clear, you do realize we women are tough enough to take it right? We do not need the paternalistic, implied sexism that you know best for us. Give me a break, I'm female and if you have a comment, bring it on. In fact, I submit, that we are tougher than most it still being the case that we had to work a little harder to advance in our careers. I'm now going back to my cookies and housecleaning and hope you continue to protect me on this blog – not!
Next time, try the indica instead.
To paraphrase Elsa, "Let it go, 2:41, let it go…"
Utah Bar just announced no bar exam for this year's graduates. Anyone who graduates this year gets admitted to the bar without a test. Has this happened anywhere since WWII?
source?
If true, what a mess. Adding way more attorneys than you normally would in the middle of a recession. Also, what about candidates that didn't pass previously and are re-taking? Going to auto admit them too?
http://www.utcourts.gov/utc/rules-comment/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2020/04/Statement-Accompanying-Emergency-Proposed-Order.pdf
Not entirely untrue, apparently: https://twitter.com/professor_smith/status/1248378126138093574
Wisconsin has allowed "diploma privilege" for quite some time. The rule requires 1) allready be registered for July bar 2) your law school must have an 86% pass rate from 2019. So UofU and BYU are in, others, not so much.
Mike Pence is VP/Former Governor hot.
Fasting and prayer is an excellent idea. Trump needs as much support as he can get.
Can't understand Science? Try Religion.
Very true; basic reasoning skills, how to count past a 6 pack of Bud, even literacy – not needed! Religion – so simple a caveman can do it!
such a narrow minded display here @10:56 and 10:53. Bravo
It's a shame the atheists always have to criticize the faith of others. It's a lonely life to not believe in something bigger than yourself, and quite arrogant as well. Today is an important day for many people of faith, do you have such little self-control that you can't shut your stupid mouth for one day? At least identify yourself please. I'd love to know the atheist asshat that I don't need to waste my efforts on, the gesture is clearly lost.
Yeah, I don't go around demeaning atheists. I have no problem listening to my atheist friends and colleagues articulate what they believe, value and why. They are earnest and sincere, and I respect that. These pot shots are just intellectually lazy. There are some atheists (a vocal minority) who think that because they are not religious, they are somehow immune from the pitfall of pride and self righteousness. It's a shame because the overwhelming majority of atheists that I know are very decent, very honest people.