2026 Judicial Election #11

  • Political newcomers Patricia Marr and Gwynneth Smith vie for Family Court bench. [NV Current]
  • Family Court race features rematch between Maxey and Gaudet. [NV Current]
administrator
43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 9:25 am

“[Gaudet] will appear on the ballot this cycle using his middle name, Michel, in an effort to make voters think he’s a woman.” It’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off for him.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 9:43 am
Reply to  Anonymous

There’s definitely been an advantage to women in these elections recently, but where does he come up with a “double-digit percentage advantage”?

I don’t mind the strategy, but I’m weirded out by him announcing it. I’m dubious of the facts he relies upon.

Most of all, his record sounds pretty bad.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 11:24 am
Reply to  Anonymous

I’m embarrassed for him.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 7:05 am
Reply to  Anonymous

That’s somehow less ick than changing your name to imply your opponent is “foreign.”

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 9:36 am
Reply to  Anonymous

The people who know… know exactly who you are talking about too.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 1:05 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Actually the name change was to be placed first on the ballot–change from maiden name to married name. That strategy worked.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 1:34 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

If you’ve never been discriminated against because your name is middle eastern, I suppose you’d believe this was about the alphabet.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 3:06 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

She took her husbands last name. Sheesh.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 3:11 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Who did? I’m confused, how does one change their name to make their opponent’s name sound foreign?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 5:12 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

When both had ethnic names they were on equal footing.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 4:13 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

The timing of taking her husbands last name was pretty interesting in that case…

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 11:05 am

Here’s a bit of fun campaign gossip. A judge appeared at a volunteer event for the homeless living in the tunnels while wearing their full campaign regalia and passing out flyers. Said judge allegedly received an admonishment from one or more of the organizers for those acts. When the tunnel folks think your behavior is inappropriate, perhaps it’s time for some self-reflection.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 11:14 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Who? You are anonymous.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 4:19 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Probably fears retribution from that judge. It’s a small legal community here after all.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 3:54 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Late to the conversation on this one it seems, but this was Peterson doing the tunnel campaigning.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 11:23 am

Can we move Goodey and Ganz up to DC already? Please?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 10:57 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Forget Ganz

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 6:37 pm

Would it be appropriate for a sitting judge to distribute campaign swag to attorneys mid-trial?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 9:45 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Did that happen??

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 16, 2026 10:43 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Stop it!!! Who did this???!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 7:38 am
Reply to  Anonymous

It was Dept. 8, handing out packs of mints labeled “re-elect Judge so-and-so” according to a few sources. Apparently she said she usually gives out gum, but that day it was just the packs of mints. Call me a purist, but I’m not sure if lawyers appearing before a judge should be placed in the position of being pressured to accept campaign merchandise from the person currently deciding legal issues affecting their clients.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 8:58 am
Reply to  Anonymous

She also recently threw her pen across the courtroom and stormed out of a hearing for several minutes because an attorney spoke over zoom to address an argument before she could respond

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 10:02 am
Reply to  Anonymous

She called me asking for money, apparently forgetting how abominably she had treated me in a case. I did not forget.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 10:11 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Normalize using names. Judge Peterson

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 10:57 am
Reply to  Anonymous

She received her Law Degree graduating cum laude from the Thomas M. Cooley Law School.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 11:03 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Is being in the top third of the class at one of the worst law schools in the country a notable achievement? I’m assuming she wasn’t a Harvard girl in undergrad.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 12:01 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Doesn’t matter. Nobody cares. I hope Judge Peterson gets re-elected.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 3:03 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Thanks Jessica.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2026 12:30 am
Reply to  Anonymous

And then passed the same bar exam as you? Either Cooley isn’t the pejorative you think it is, or seems like she’s super smart to have the same bar license as all you elitists trying to knock her down.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2026 11:02 am
Reply to  Anonymous

I’m no elitist, but let’s be honest here. People tend to go to the best law school they can gain admittance to, that or they stay in their home state for in-state tuition, local familiarity, etc. If you leave your home state to go to the worst law school in the country, there are reasons for that decision and none of them indicate a high level of academic prowess.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 21, 2026 2:40 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

While I don’t know her situation, I do know that some of my smart friends were forced to go out of state to bad schools because they spent all their undergrad years drunk/hungover and their GPAs (but not their LSATs) made admission to a Top 50 law school very difficult.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 22, 2026 9:36 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Ha, that was my situation exactly. 2.41 undergrad GPA and 96th percentile on the LSAT right out of college. The rejection letters from top-50 schools came in very quickly. Had to choose my law school based on tuition and local cost of living price. It wasn’t top-50; but thank God it wasn’t Cooley.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 22, 2026 10:19 am
Reply to  Anonymous

My situation was similar, but not as dramatic. My storyline is that my law school GPA was higher than my undergrad GPA which was higher than my high school GPA. This is not a flex, as some people in our position present it. It is a story of a lack of discipline and wasted talent. My parents and teachers did try, this was not their fault. It was mine.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 22, 2026 10:21 am
Reply to  Anonymous

10:19 AM here. I’ll add this anecdote. Because my high school GPA was so awful, I was left with the choice of going to the local university, which basically had open enrollment. This made my ACT a perfunctory act. I did not study for it, at all. I stayed up late the night prior watching TV. I scored a 33. It was a gut punch and the first time I realized that I had really squandered my potential. I was ill from it. A useless, meaningless 33.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 21, 2026 3:31 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Cooley used to weed out marginal students. Not sure they do that anymore. Used to be one of the largest law schools in the country now a much smaller class.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 11:06 am
Reply to  Anonymous

That’s some poor judgemint

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 21, 2026 2:41 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

With jokes like that I’m sure you graduated gum laude.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 8:17 am
Reply to  Anonymous

No that is possible grounds for a Judicial Ethics complaint but not the most serious violation.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 3:08 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

She threw her pen and walked away? What case was it! Must be Javs of it.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 17, 2026 3:09 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

No doubt she’s getting re elected. Great name.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2026 2:38 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

I second this. She loses her cool constantly, throwing a pen is par for the course.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 21, 2026 2:38 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

At least it wasn’t a copy of the constitution. Things be flying at the EJDC.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 22, 2026 10:20 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Kinda ironic that Scotti threw a physical constitution as an admittedly poor demonstration that you shouldn’t just toss the constitution aside and do whatever you want. Peterson on the other hand tosses the Constitution aside in her media trial to do whatever she wanted, but managed not to physically toss it while doing so.