2024 Judicial Election #11

administrator
23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 10:02 am

No to Maxey. Her career has virtually no domestic experience. She spent her time in juvenile court and guardianship. While technically family court, it’s not what she’d be doing as a judge. We’ve already got Parlade in Dept A handling a domestic calendar and the majority of her career was spent in CPS cases. Frankly, she struggles with the law and does not do a good job handling domestic matters. Add to that, Gaudet has been doing a great job. He’s got the right temperament and he’s smart. I suggest you watch his interview with Our Nevada Judges. His opinions on out sourced providers are spot on. Family court practitioners need to start following the rules and that includes NRCP 35 and Hallmark. No more judges letting paid hacks spout nonsense and pseudo science in the courtroom.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 10:07 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Not sure about Maxey, but family law doesn’t exactly require any heavy mental lifting

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 10:28 am
Reply to  Anonymous

You say that, but when you get dragged into family court those mental light weights can be the ones determining where your money and your children go. Disparaging family court is fair. It is a train wreck. But that’s not an excuse to vote for more of the same. Gaudet is doing good work. He’s got my vote and I’ll probably donate to his campaign.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 11:53 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Maxey is a woman. That’s all you need to know. She’ll win.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 23, 2024 12:12 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

– Sincerely, someone who lost student body president in high school to a girl and never got over it.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 10:36 am

Gaudet is doing a great job. No need for a change here.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 10:36 am

Gaudet has my vote

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 11:54 am

Female candidates have a nearly insurmountable advantage in Clark County judicial elections. Prove me wrong.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 12:14 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Agreed and it’s unfortunate. Gaudet is doing a good job and deserves to keep the seat.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 12:18 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Very unfortunate because it keeps some otherwise very good lawyers/legal minds off the bench.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 12:26 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

At least Gaudet is higher then Maxey on the alphabetized ballot. That with the Incumbent position might be enough to overcome the female advantage.

Should’ve started calling himself Paul a. Gaudet

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 3:50 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Didn’t help Atkin

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2024 6:52 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Fair enough.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 2:54 pm

I am voting for Guadet.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 8:45 pm

Hope the 2020 women wave takes a pause this year. Enough with inexperienced women getting either appointed or running for a seat out of the realm of their law experience and practice.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 19, 2024 8:49 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Bruh. It aint a wave. It’s reality.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2024 6:53 am
Reply to  Anonymous

. . . .and it sure the hell did not start in 2020.

Last edited 23 days ago by Anonymous
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2024 9:23 am

What is the reasoning behind the high probability of success of women winning judicial elections? Was always curious about that.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2024 10:07 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Low information voters.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2024 10:35 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Sure, I guess my question more specifically is why do low info voters generally vote for women?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2024 11:55 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Well, according to the peer reviewed study in 2022 BY the sociology department at the University of . . . . . . . GTFOH.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 20, 2024 1:52 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

A study/poll done on the subject by one of the political consultants found that all things being equal-female judicial voters will favor female judicial candidates 55 to 45 per cent. Women make up the slight majority of voters in Nevada–something like 51 or 52 per cent. Women vote more frequently. Early voting favors female turnout. Women candidates appeal to women voters by running their ads on TV during peak times like during shows that females voters watch. Most voters don’t know the judicial candidates and don’t care to learn or research it. Unless there is something negative then it still favors female v. male. On the otherand–two female candidates generally have no advantage.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
September 23, 2024 12:12 pm

This comment section is so telling. I can almost hear Andrew Tate in the background through my screen.