Former Nevada board chief accuses gaming regulators of racial discrimination. [RJ]
Accused serial killer, who police suspect worked as a hit man, tracked victims with GPS in loan fraud scheme, previously asked for forgiveness according to documents. [8NewsNow]
Attorney for exonerated man speaks after hitman charged for Summerlin murder. [News3LV]
Las Vegas city council pushes Legal Aid Center expansion forward. [Fox5Vegas]
Las Vegas VA medical facility held patient against will, says Inspector General. [Fox5Vegas]
Judge Jennifer Dorsey rules that Michele Fiore cannot argue she’s being politically persecuted during wire fraud trial. [TNI; RJ]
News organizations petition Nevada Supreme Court to open up secret Murdoch succession case. [CNN]
Complaints prompt federal investigation into Nevada’s immigration detention centers. [TNI]
Report: Knights mulling options after Robin Lehner no-show for physical. [RJ; KTNV]
The opponents of the Mormon Temple have filed for leave to amend to overcome their standing issue. Surprisingly, the proposed amended petition has all of the same unsubstantiated, hyperbolic conspiracy claims and drafting errors. What is going on with this????
It sounds like maybe the opponents of the Mormon Temple have filed for leave to amend to overcome their standing issue and that the proposed amended petition has all of the same unsubstantiated, hyperbolic conspiracy claims and drafting errors. But I’m just guessing.
As someone who did construction defect litigation for a few years, the first thing that struck me were his references to CD work. Mr. Schwab, you clearly don’t know how HOA standing differs from homeowner standing. Hint: the injuries are not the same. Keep my (former) cookie-eatin’ practice out yo’ damn mouth.
For those of us who don’t know, what’s the difference? I looked over the request for leave to amend and it seemed pretty reasonable to me. I would guess that Israel will grant it. Am I wrong?
Why wouldn’t the judge give the real parties in interest a reasonable opportunity? (3) Joinder of the Real Party in Interest. The court may not dismiss an action for failure to prosecute in the name of the real party in interest until, after an objection, a reasonable time has been allowed for the real party in interest to ratify, join, or be substituted into the action. After ratification, joinder, or substitution, the action proceeds as if it had been originally commenced by the real party in interest. NRCP 17(a)(3)
But the Motion to Dismiss is not complex. The Petitioner is the wrong party. The deadline is jurisdictional and there can’t be a substitution under Nevada case law.
Probate Commissioner
There is a SBN announcement for a probate commissioner in the 8th. Is this for a second commissioner, which I think is badly needed? Or did the current commissioner get fed up?
We all know these are not the kind of clients that pay well. They are the kind of clients that, when the PJR is dismissed for a lack of standing, will stiff counsel for the bill, shit on him online (and in this case, to the press), file a bar complaint and sue him for malpractice.
This looks like a substantial compliance versus substantive compliance issue.
WHITESBURG, Ky. (AP) — The sheriff charged with murder in the shooting of a rural Kentucky judge in his courthouse chambers was accused in a federal lawsuit of failing to investigate allegations that one of his deputies repeatedly sexually abused a woman in the same judge’s chambers.
The opponents of the Mormon Temple have filed for leave to amend to overcome their standing issue. Surprisingly, the proposed amended petition has all of the same unsubstantiated, hyperbolic conspiracy claims and drafting errors. What is going on with this????
It sounds like maybe the opponents of the Mormon Temple have filed for leave to amend to overcome their standing issue and that the proposed amended petition has all of the same unsubstantiated, hyperbolic conspiracy claims and drafting errors. But I’m just guessing.
As someone who did construction defect litigation for a few years, the first thing that struck me were his references to CD work. Mr. Schwab, you clearly don’t know how HOA standing differs from homeowner standing. Hint: the injuries are not the same. Keep my (former) cookie-eatin’ practice out yo’ damn mouth.
For those of us who don’t know, what’s the difference? I looked over the request for leave to amend and it seemed pretty reasonable to me. I would guess that Israel will grant it. Am I wrong?
Why wouldn’t the judge give the real parties in interest a reasonable opportunity? (3) Joinder of the Real Party in Interest. The court may not dismiss an action for failure to prosecute in the name of the real party in interest until, after an objection, a reasonable time has been allowed for the real party in interest to ratify, join, or be substituted into the action. After ratification, joinder, or substitution, the action proceeds as if it had been originally commenced by the real party in interest. NRCP 17(a)(3)
Because this Israel. Who knows on any given day if he has even read the pleadings in the case, especially a case this complex.
But the Motion to Dismiss is not complex. The Petitioner is the wrong party. The deadline is jurisdictional and there can’t be a substitution under Nevada case law.
You have just read more about the Motion than Judge Israel most likely ever will.
Ok Will
Probate Commissioner
There is a SBN announcement for a probate commissioner in the 8th. Is this for a second commissioner, which I think is badly needed? Or did the current commissioner get fed up?
A second commissioner
Exploding Pagers
Brilliant, in planning and execution.
It’s like right out of a movie. Terrifying and awesome.
Like my girlfriends vajayjay
Mark Robinson, is that you?
No, Denny Crane
Very funny!
Mormon Temple opponents have filed a SECOND lawsuit. A-24-901801-C
Lol. Open meeting violation? Yeah, that’s going exactly nowhere.
Evan, hope these folks are paying you well.
We all know these are not the kind of clients that pay well. They are the kind of clients that, when the PJR is dismissed for a lack of standing, will stiff counsel for the bill, shit on him online (and in this case, to the press), file a bar complaint and sue him for malpractice.
This looks like a substantial compliance versus substantive compliance issue.
*substantial compliance vs. strict compliance.
Holy crap. This puts the Telles story to shame
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna171902
Kentucky Judge shot and killed in his Chambers by Sheriff.
That story is nucking futs!
What’s up Dickie?
WHITESBURG, Ky. (AP) — The sheriff charged with murder in the shooting of a rural Kentucky judge in his courthouse chambers was accused in a federal lawsuit of failing to investigate allegations that one of his deputies repeatedly sexually abused a woman in the same judge’s chambers.