Candidate for lieutenant governor physically removed from county commission meeting is suing Tick Segerblom for slander and libel. [RJ]
Abuse of 3-year-old with disabilities detailed in federal suit filed by mother represented by Khaldoun Baghdadi (and Rahul Ravipudi as local counsel). [8NewsNow]
Sean Tanko is the best choice. He has the judicial temperment (demostrated by years of acting as Pro Tem Commissioner). Knowledgeable. Intelligent. Experienced. Works very, very hard.
If you do an Odyssey search on open cases under Blair Cowan's bar #, it's 99% insurance defense of auto accidents. A search on the CC portal under his name shows not a single P case in the past 5 years (~200 results showed). How does that qualify him to be a probate commissioner? There would be no way I would ever appoint him as a probate commissioner. He may be a great candidate for a judge, or a civil court type hearing master – but probate? I don't see it.
Sean Tanko & Roger Giuliani on the other hand have actual probate experience.
Are these the only three that applied? (I'm trying to figure out how someone got on the list with what appears to be zero probate experience)
Is Roger Giuliani related to Family Court Judge Giuliani? Probate is one of the areas of law that all lawyers practice. Someone is always dying and an as lawyers we are always dealing with probate issues such as opening an estate or disagreements amongst heirs–family members or clients. That being said the Proate Commmissioner has an impossible job with limited staff. Eighth Judicial District Court has had one Probate Commissioner while the population has doubled in thirty years or so. We now have a Disocovery Commissioner and an ADR Commissioner but only one Probate Commissioner along with the same limited staff. The Probate Commissioner's Office has to interact with Pro Pers and Pro Se litigants. Many of the attorneys that appear in Probate are not very skiled in the subject. The current docket is growing and there is a huge backlog of cases. Something must be done to addres these issues. So whoever gets the job and hopefully it is Sean Tanko will be walking into an impossible situation.
Blair Parker has done probate in the sense that in Plaintiff's personal injury/wrongful death cases sometimes you have to open an estate.
Roger is Cynthia's husband. Great guy. Love it if he could become a Discovery/ADR Commissioner for Family Court in coordination with FMC. But not the probate commissioner.
Sean Tanko is the most qualified choice and has been doing it as a pro tem. Do have some robe fever and good ol' boy concerns with Sean. However it is hard to get someone who has (1) experience but (2) is not part of the probate good ol'boy club.
30 years probate experience — the office is sadly under-staffed and backlogged. Two commissioners are needed, but less expensive would be to use unpaid law interns for routine file work (with academic credit of course) and to add a second block of time for hearing the weekly calendar. Sean Tanko and Alice Denton are both good choices.
Alice Denton, Esq., Ma'am,
A robe is waiting in the court for you.
If you don it right now, maybe you can stem the tide
Oh, Alice Denton, Esq. Ma'am
Probate lawyers will defer to you
If you manage to get this right
Friday Mornings will be so bright
Intestacy won't suck so bad, Alice Denton
The substantive area of probate is not that difficult to master. It is easier to master than Family Law, Criminal Law or civil practice. When Commissioner Biggar assumed the duties of Probate Commissioner he was not a specialist in the field. Commissioner Ashworth's law summary is still posted on the Probate site. He has not been there since 2008. The challenge is the Eighth Judicial District Court is when you get a judge who worked in the Public Defender's Office and has had no civil experience. It is so hard to educate a judge from that background. Likewise, a judge who has done nothing but civil is a fish out of water handling a criminal calendar and will make egregious mistakes.
The basics of probate law are not difficult to master. It's basically what's in Don Ashworth's synopsis, although that document is woefully out of date. It is not difficult, for example, to do a straight forward set aside. That is not true, however, of the 10 or so contested matters each week. Those matters implicate probate and trust law that can be quite complex and nuanced. A person without experience would struggle mightily with these cases and issues.
Complex probate cases contested. 10:54 AM–It is up to the counsel for the parties to state the law clearly and make the case for relief. What is so hard about that. Many attorneys who handle will/probate contests which end up in District Court are handled by attorneys who are just good litigators not necessarily experts in the field of probate/estate planning. Example: The Howard Hughes Will case. So really what is the big deal here if you have not specialzied in probate you don't belong as the Commissioner argument. Really???
Guest
Anonymous
February 10, 2022 7:02 pm
Mack Miller is associated with he who shall not be named. Nice of the RJ to gloss over that fact…and barely mention his history of criminal behavior, including desertion during the Iraq war. Looks like Tick was dead on when he called Miller a traitor. And Miller's response to the claim he hit someone was not to deny it, but to argue there is no evidence or video of it happening. Because that's what innocent people say. The RJ continues to suck.
I, like 11:04, have seen this joke regularly appear on this blog and would love some insight into who we are referring to (I love inside jokes…I'd love to be a part of one someday -Michael Scott)
He who shall not be named is a politically active person who purports to serve the interests of those who have served in the military. He endorses judicial or other political candidates and was known to camp out in front of the family court house and stage protests there.
For good or for bad, periodically people need to be reminded that Sreve Sransron is out there. And I will be the first to admit that he does take on same bad guys that exist in the family law field.
I will still be wearing my mask in public places. I have very little interest in standing in the elevators in the RJC without a mask. Even pre-COVID that was always a bit sketchy.
Elevators? Hell – I've sat on my behind so much working from home I need to walk those stairs and contribute to the sweaty/pissy smell of the stairwells.
Guest
Anonymous
February 10, 2022 9:37 pm
Within an hour after the Sisolak announcement, I ran to Whole Foods to get a quick lunch, and HALF the people in there were not wearing a mask already.
Pretty liberal here but, totally agree. Gone on long enough, if you're vaxxed you're likely fine. If you're not vaxxed and don't want to wear a mask, the world is ready to say "suit yourself."
Its OK people. Its OK. This has NOTHING to do with the Super Bowl this weekend. Nothing at all! No politics whatsoever. I promise that the casinos did not lobby the Govs office to remove the mandates in time for Super Bowl weekend.
Nothing to see here. Just be grateful for a shred of freedom returned to you.
Guest
Anonymous
February 10, 2022 11:32 pm
I thought we were always supposed to listen to "THE Science" as manifested in the CDC and the NIH? And that if you don't, you are a wackadoodle dip shit? I guess that mandate is over now too? As a fully vaxxed, mask wearing, libertarianish, conformist I'm having a tough time with the fact that I am just realizing that all of this was likely politically driven. You can give me all the arguments you want about why you think Sisolak's decision is scientifically sound, or that you are now ready to let the unvaxxed reap the fruits of their decisions, but if you used the term "I follow THE Science" to look down your nose at someone else and you are throwing off your mask now, you have some reflecting to do. The CDC still recommends masks. https://www.deseret.com/coronavirus/2022/2/9/22925229/mask-mandates-end-covid-restrictions-cdc-director. This is not addressed those who were simply willing to try to participate in society as considerate or law abiding individuals and who were acting on the best information at the time. This is specifically directed at the pseudo smart elitists who were guided by their politics to degrade and label the people that did not agree with them as stupid through an appeal to authority they really did not understand and probably won't adhere to now.
I agree that THIS decision was politically driven. But I just don't understand the argument that the entire last two years was politically driven. Like a governor wants to impose unnecessary mandates just to F with people? To what end?
To me, the politics were clear back when Biden and Harris both stated that they would not get the vaccine that Trump developed. Great, except that we all knew that Trump himself was not sporting a white lab coat and brewing up a batch of vax. I'm neither Dem nor Rep and feel like somewhere along the line this Covid concern grew into a source of a political leverage and ultimately an abuse of power, victimizing all of us. I share your frustration.
The only benefit I could possibly see coming from these last two years of shutdowns and mandates is that society develops somewhat of a libertarian streak and learns to be at least a little skeptical of elected officials. Just because you personally align with a politician's views generally, doesn't mean what they say or want will always be in yours (or the country's) best interests. As we've all seen, politicians now care more being contrarian to (or "dunking" on) the opposing side rather than advancing substantive policy.
Harris was asked in a Sept. 6, 2020, interview whether she would take a vaccine if it was approved before the election. She replied:
"Well, I think that's going to be an issue for all of us. I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump. And it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about. I will not take his word for it. He wants us to inject bleach. I — no, I will not take his word."
Harris was asked in an Oct. 7, 2020, vice presidential debate if she would take a vaccine if the Trump administration approved one. Referring to the leading government epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Fauci, she said:
"If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it."
In a July 28, 2020 campaign speech, Biden stressed the need for transparency in developing the vaccine. He said:
"How are you going to distribute the vaccine when it arrives, when it arrives, when it’s there? And the question of whether it’s real, when it’s there, that requires enormous transparency. You’ve got to make all of it available to other experts across the nation, so they can look and see, so there’s consensus this is a safe vaccine. Because already you have, what percent is American people saying if the vaccine were there tomorrow, they wouldn’t take it? And it’s not the usual anti-vaccine crowd. It’s beyond that because people are losing faith in what the president says. Think about it."
In campaign remarks on Sept. 7, 2020, Biden outlined steps he would take to address the pandemic and stated:
"Charting a clear path of science-based vaccines, free from politics. I get asked the question: ‘If the president announced tomorrow we have a vaccine, would you take it?’ Only if it was completely transparent, that other experts in the country could look at it, only if we knew all of what went into it. Because so far, nothing he’s told us has been true."
In a more perfect world, we could understand each sides viewpoint without attacking the other side as being ignorant, brain-washed, a shill for the political party they belong to, etc.
Why can't anyone concede anything to the other side? It shouldn't be all that hard. So, I'll give it a shot.
Yes, the anti-vaccinators have valid points that many people who are vaccinated still wind up with Covid, and they are also quite correct that the vaccinations themselves can often cause serious side effects.
And the pro-vaccinators are right that one's chances of getting Covid are significantly reduced if fully vaccinated, and that vaccinated people who still get Covid tend to have far less severe symptoms than un-vaccinated Covid victims.
That all said, on balance I personally believe the pro-vaccination approach is the better medical and health approach, but I understand and respect that millions of intelligent people feel differently.
However, I never had much faith or confidence that the mask mandate was particularly effective. Perhaps it would be if we carried the mask(when not in use) in some sort of safe, cleansed container.
But people like me tend to say, "Oh, I just arrived at work. Let me see where I can find a f***ing mask." And I then find a crumpled one on the car floor, mixed in with al the other filthy debris.
And a lot of other people are almost as filthy and irresponsible as I am in this regard, whether they admit it or not.
Guest
Anonymous
February 11, 2022 12:06 am
After two years of this circus, the thing I've noticed is that the people who most vehemently denounce making COVID political are usually the ones making it political. To those of you who fall within this category, thanks for all the unnecessary conflict and drama that you forced the rest of us through.
Guest
Anonymous
February 11, 2022 12:10 am
Funeral of Ben Graham
Thursday, Feb 17, 2022
2:00 PM
CHRIST CHURCH 2000 SO. MARYLAND
Guest
Anonymous
February 11, 2022 12:12 am
Ben is survived by his wife, Elana Turner Graham, his seven children and their spouses, 19 grandchildren, a nephew and niece and their families. His children from his first marriage are Wayne, Lynmarie, Ben, and Lorissa. From his marriage to Elana, his children and their spouses are Turner and Nicole, Luana and Frank, and Elana Lee and Seth.
A Celebration of Life will be held at Christ Church Episcopal at 2000 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89104 on February 17, 2022 at 3 p.m. The family requests that, in lieu of flowers, donations be made to Ben's daughter's memorial 501(c)(3) foundation. Please make checks to the Caroline Graham-Lamberts Loving Life Foundation (www.carolineslovinglife.com) and mail to Elana Graham, 7121 Doe Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89117, or you can donate via PayPal at paypal.me/CarolinesFoundation or @carolinesfoundation.
The three finalists for Probate Commissioner are Sean Tanko, Roger Giuliani and Blair Parker.
I don't know Blair Parker, but this puzzles me. His application to be a judge in 2019 is detailed and has no references to probate in it. https://nvcourts.gov/AOC/Committees_and_Commissions/Judicial_Selection/Applications_and_Images/Eighth_Judicial_District,_Department_8_Juy_2019/PARKER-PUBLIC/
Sean Tanko is the best choice. He has the judicial temperment (demostrated by years of acting as Pro Tem Commissioner). Knowledgeable. Intelligent. Experienced. Works very, very hard.
Giuliani would do a good job too.
If you do an Odyssey search on open cases under Blair Cowan's bar #, it's 99% insurance defense of auto accidents. A search on the CC portal under his name shows not a single P case in the past 5 years (~200 results showed). How does that qualify him to be a probate commissioner? There would be no way I would ever appoint him as a probate commissioner. He may be a great candidate for a judge, or a civil court type hearing master – but probate? I don't see it.
Sean Tanko & Roger Giuliani on the other hand have actual probate experience.
Are these the only three that applied? (I'm trying to figure out how someone got on the list with what appears to be zero probate experience)
Is Roger Giuliani related to Family Court Judge Giuliani? Probate is one of the areas of law that all lawyers practice. Someone is always dying and an as lawyers we are always dealing with probate issues such as opening an estate or disagreements amongst heirs–family members or clients. That being said the Proate Commmissioner has an impossible job with limited staff. Eighth Judicial District Court has had one Probate Commissioner while the population has doubled in thirty years or so. We now have a Disocovery Commissioner and an ADR Commissioner but only one Probate Commissioner along with the same limited staff. The Probate Commissioner's Office has to interact with Pro Pers and Pro Se litigants. Many of the attorneys that appear in Probate are not very skiled in the subject. The current docket is growing and there is a huge backlog of cases. Something must be done to addres these issues. So whoever gets the job and hopefully it is Sean Tanko will be walking into an impossible situation.
Blair Parker has done probate in the sense that in Plaintiff's personal injury/wrongful death cases sometimes you have to open an estate.
Roger is Cynthia's husband. Great guy. Love it if he could become a Discovery/ADR Commissioner for Family Court in coordination with FMC. But not the probate commissioner.
Sean Tanko is the most qualified choice and has been doing it as a pro tem. Do have some robe fever and good ol' boy concerns with Sean. However it is hard to get someone who has (1) experience but (2) is not part of the probate good ol'boy club.
They should pick two of them. My probate stuff is getting set three months or more out. It's insane.
They should pick two. But definitely not 2 of the 3 listed. Pick Tanko and.. Idk. Someone else. Draft Alice Denton, Jon Barlow, or Tom Grover.
@1:12p – If we could nominate and then conscript a probate commissioner, my choice is Alice Denton.
30 years probate experience — the office is sadly under-staffed and backlogged. Two commissioners are needed, but less expensive would be to use unpaid law interns for routine file work (with academic credit of course) and to add a second block of time for hearing the weekly calendar. Sean Tanko and Alice Denton are both good choices.
Alice Denton, Esq., Ma'am,
A robe is waiting in the court for you.
If you don it right now, maybe you can stem the tide
Oh, Alice Denton, Esq. Ma'am
Probate lawyers will defer to you
If you manage to get this right
Friday Mornings will be so bright
Intestacy won't suck so bad, Alice Denton
The substantive area of probate is not that difficult to master. It is easier to master than Family Law, Criminal Law or civil practice. When Commissioner Biggar assumed the duties of Probate Commissioner he was not a specialist in the field. Commissioner Ashworth's law summary is still posted on the Probate site. He has not been there since 2008. The challenge is the Eighth Judicial District Court is when you get a judge who worked in the Public Defender's Office and has had no civil experience. It is so hard to educate a judge from that background. Likewise, a judge who has done nothing but civil is a fish out of water handling a criminal calendar and will make egregious mistakes.
The basics of probate law are not difficult to master. It's basically what's in Don Ashworth's synopsis, although that document is woefully out of date. It is not difficult, for example, to do a straight forward set aside. That is not true, however, of the 10 or so contested matters each week. Those matters implicate probate and trust law that can be quite complex and nuanced. A person without experience would struggle mightily with these cases and issues.
10:54,
See, e.g. Senior Judges.
Complex probate cases contested. 10:54 AM–It is up to the counsel for the parties to state the law clearly and make the case for relief. What is so hard about that. Many attorneys who handle will/probate contests which end up in District Court are handled by attorneys who are just good litigators not necessarily experts in the field of probate/estate planning. Example: The Howard Hughes Will case. So really what is the big deal here if you have not specialzied in probate you don't belong as the Commissioner argument. Really???
Mack Miller is associated with he who shall not be named. Nice of the RJ to gloss over that fact…and barely mention his history of criminal behavior, including desertion during the Iraq war. Looks like Tick was dead on when he called Miller a traitor. And Miller's response to the claim he hit someone was not to deny it, but to argue there is no evidence or video of it happening. Because that's what innocent people say. The RJ continues to suck.
He who shall not be named?
If you name him, he will appear. He has an RSS feed for his name.
Don't you do it! Do not summon him, for he brings a pox with him!
I, like 11:04, have seen this joke regularly appear on this blog and would love some insight into who we are referring to (I love inside jokes…I'd love to be a part of one someday -Michael Scott)
He who shall not be named is a politically active person who purports to serve the interests of those who have served in the military. He endorses judicial or other political candidates and was known to camp out in front of the family court house and stage protests there.
For good or for bad, periodically people need to be reminded that Sreve Sransron is out there. And I will be the first to admit that he does take on same bad guys that exist in the family law field.
What I'd give to be a fly on the wall during a settlement conference on the Tick lawsuit.
There will be no settlement conference. Clearly the plaintiff is about to get an education on anti-SLAPP litigation.
I'm burning my mask.
I haven't worn one in MONTHS, except on airplanes and in hospitals. This changes nothing for me.
Alert: We've got an internet tough guy!
Yes there are the mask evangelists out there, but by and large nobody cares if you've been wearing a mask. Thanks for the cool story though.
I will still be wearing my mask in public places. I have very little interest in standing in the elevators in the RJC without a mask. Even pre-COVID that was always a bit sketchy.
Yeah, not looking forward to getting back on those elevators on a regular basis. A real petri dish.
Elevators? Hell – I've sat on my behind so much working from home I need to walk those stairs and contribute to the sweaty/pissy smell of the stairwells.
Within an hour after the Sisolak announcement, I ran to Whole Foods to get a quick lunch, and HALF the people in there were not wearing a mask already.
Freedom feels great!
Pretty liberal here but, totally agree. Gone on long enough, if you're vaxxed you're likely fine. If you're not vaxxed and don't want to wear a mask, the world is ready to say "suit yourself."
OP and I have vastly different definitions of freedom. I felt pretty darn free yesterday.
Its OK people. Its OK. This has NOTHING to do with the Super Bowl this weekend. Nothing at all! No politics whatsoever. I promise that the casinos did not lobby the Govs office to remove the mandates in time for Super Bowl weekend.
Nothing to see here. Just be grateful for a shred of freedom returned to you.
I thought we were always supposed to listen to "THE Science" as manifested in the CDC and the NIH? And that if you don't, you are a wackadoodle dip shit? I guess that mandate is over now too? As a fully vaxxed, mask wearing, libertarianish, conformist I'm having a tough time with the fact that I am just realizing that all of this was likely politically driven. You can give me all the arguments you want about why you think Sisolak's decision is scientifically sound, or that you are now ready to let the unvaxxed reap the fruits of their decisions, but if you used the term "I follow THE Science" to look down your nose at someone else and you are throwing off your mask now, you have some reflecting to do. The CDC still recommends masks. https://www.deseret.com/coronavirus/2022/2/9/22925229/mask-mandates-end-covid-restrictions-cdc-director. This is not addressed those who were simply willing to try to participate in society as considerate or law abiding individuals and who were acting on the best information at the time. This is specifically directed at the pseudo smart elitists who were guided by their politics to degrade and label the people that did not agree with them as stupid through an appeal to authority they really did not understand and probably won't adhere to now.
I agree that THIS decision was politically driven. But I just don't understand the argument that the entire last two years was politically driven. Like a governor wants to impose unnecessary mandates just to F with people? To what end?
To me, the politics were clear back when Biden and Harris both stated that they would not get the vaccine that Trump developed. Great, except that we all knew that Trump himself was not sporting a white lab coat and brewing up a batch of vax. I'm neither Dem nor Rep and feel like somewhere along the line this Covid concern grew into a source of a political leverage and ultimately an abuse of power, victimizing all of us. I share your frustration.
The only benefit I could possibly see coming from these last two years of shutdowns and mandates is that society develops somewhat of a libertarian streak and learns to be at least a little skeptical of elected officials. Just because you personally align with a politician's views generally, doesn't mean what they say or want will always be in yours (or the country's) best interests. As we've all seen, politicians now care more being contrarian to (or "dunking" on) the opposing side rather than advancing substantive policy.
Harris was asked in a Sept. 6, 2020, interview whether she would take a vaccine if it was approved before the election. She replied:
"Well, I think that's going to be an issue for all of us. I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump. And it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about. I will not take his word for it. He wants us to inject bleach. I — no, I will not take his word."
Harris was asked in an Oct. 7, 2020, vice presidential debate if she would take a vaccine if the Trump administration approved one. Referring to the leading government epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Fauci, she said:
"If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it."
In a July 28, 2020 campaign speech, Biden stressed the need for transparency in developing the vaccine. He said:
"How are you going to distribute the vaccine when it arrives, when it arrives, when it’s there? And the question of whether it’s real, when it’s there, that requires enormous transparency. You’ve got to make all of it available to other experts across the nation, so they can look and see, so there’s consensus this is a safe vaccine. Because already you have, what percent is American people saying if the vaccine were there tomorrow, they wouldn’t take it? And it’s not the usual anti-vaccine crowd. It’s beyond that because people are losing faith in what the president says. Think about it."
In campaign remarks on Sept. 7, 2020, Biden outlined steps he would take to address the pandemic and stated:
"Charting a clear path of science-based vaccines, free from politics. I get asked the question: ‘If the president announced tomorrow we have a vaccine, would you take it?’ Only if it was completely transparent, that other experts in the country could look at it, only if we knew all of what went into it. Because so far, nothing he’s told us has been true."
In a more perfect world, we could understand each sides viewpoint without attacking the other side as being ignorant, brain-washed, a shill for the political party they belong to, etc.
Why can't anyone concede anything to the other side? It shouldn't be all that hard. So, I'll give it a shot.
Yes, the anti-vaccinators have valid points that many people who are vaccinated still wind up with Covid, and they are also quite correct that the vaccinations themselves can often cause serious side effects.
And the pro-vaccinators are right that one's chances of getting Covid are significantly reduced if fully vaccinated, and that vaccinated people who still get Covid tend to have far less severe symptoms than un-vaccinated Covid victims.
That all said, on balance I personally believe the pro-vaccination approach is the better medical and health approach, but I understand and respect that millions of intelligent people feel differently.
However, I never had much faith or confidence that the mask mandate was particularly effective. Perhaps it would be if we carried the mask(when not in use) in some sort of safe, cleansed container.
But people like me tend to say, "Oh, I just arrived at work. Let me see where I can find a f***ing mask." And I then find a crumpled one on the car floor, mixed in with al the other filthy debris.
And a lot of other people are almost as filthy and irresponsible as I am in this regard, whether they admit it or not.
After two years of this circus, the thing I've noticed is that the people who most vehemently denounce making COVID political are usually the ones making it political. To those of you who fall within this category, thanks for all the unnecessary conflict and drama that you forced the rest of us through.
Funeral of Ben Graham
Thursday, Feb 17, 2022
2:00 PM
CHRIST CHURCH 2000 SO. MARYLAND
Ben is survived by his wife, Elana Turner Graham, his seven children and their spouses, 19 grandchildren, a nephew and niece and their families. His children from his first marriage are Wayne, Lynmarie, Ben, and Lorissa. From his marriage to Elana, his children and their spouses are Turner and Nicole, Luana and Frank, and Elana Lee and Seth.
A Celebration of Life will be held at Christ Church Episcopal at 2000 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89104 on February 17, 2022 at 3 p.m. The family requests that, in lieu of flowers, donations be made to Ben's daughter's memorial 501(c)(3) foundation. Please make checks to the Caroline Graham-Lamberts Loving Life Foundation (www.carolineslovinglife.com) and mail to Elana Graham, 7121 Doe Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89117, or you can donate via PayPal at paypal.me/CarolinesFoundation or @carolinesfoundation.