Amazon prime deportations. Yes, this is what we voted for. Mass immigration is contrary to the idea of nations, states, and peoples. Your ancestors knew this or you wouldn’t be here today.
Not technically true. When they walked there were few borders. The borders by definition were meant to contain and separate and keep out. If you’re for one world just say it. I happen to like language, borders, culture for all.
There were imaginary lines on the ground, yes. There were mostly no impediments to immigration and one could just walk in from anywhere without much trouble and it wasn’t illegal
This is a silly take, at best.
85% of all legal immigrants from 1820-1940 came in through New York, New Orleans and either Boston of Philadelphia. Meaning that they came by boat. So “walked” is a misnomer, again at best.
12:55 agreeing with you. Also, “open borders” at least for a few thousand years is a silly concept. People were extremely closed off and protective. On a micro scale people rarely escaped the clan etc. I knew someday my prehistory class would come in handy!
My ancestors came to the U.S. from Europe by boat, and were off-loaded at Ellis Island, where they were examined and processed by the federal government before being released into the U.S.
Catching up on the news from yesterday and saw someone say that you need to file an answer in response to a pro se informal brief. To hopefully save our question-asker some time: You don’t actually need to file an answering brief in pro se appeals unless the Court orders a response. (RIP your billables) See NRAP 46A(c) (“An opposing party is not required to respond to documents, including briefs, filed by a party appearing pro se unless ordered to do so by the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals.”); NRAP 31 (d)(2) (“A respondent who fails to timely file an answering brief will not be heard at oral argument unless the court grants permission, and such failure may be treated as a confession of error. Unless the court has ordered the respondent to file an answering brief as provided in Rule 46A(c), this Rule does not apply to appeals in which the appellant is not represented by counsel.”)
If the court does order an answering brief, then yes, you still need to do everything required under NRAP 28(b).
Guest
Anonymous
April 9, 2025 1:57 pm
I heard an Alien v. Predator theory that was pretty interesting. If illegal aliens want to stay in America, they have to sucessfully track and detain 5 child predators.
Amazon prime deportations. Yes, this is what we voted for. Mass immigration is contrary to the idea of nations, states, and peoples. Your ancestors knew this or you wouldn’t be here today.
U just made the argument for the opposite of what u were trying to. Yes, mass IMMIGRATION is contrary. Thx for joining the good side.
most of our ancestors also walked across open borders
Not technically true. When they walked there were few borders. The borders by definition were meant to contain and separate and keep out. If you’re for one world just say it. I happen to like language, borders, culture for all.
There were imaginary lines on the ground, yes. There were mostly no impediments to immigration and one could just walk in from anywhere without much trouble and it wasn’t illegal
This is a silly take, at best.
85% of all legal immigrants from 1820-1940 came in through New York, New Orleans and either Boston of Philadelphia. Meaning that they came by boat. So “walked” is a misnomer, again at best.
12:55 agreeing with you. Also, “open borders” at least for a few thousand years is a silly concept. People were extremely closed off and protective. On a micro scale people rarely escaped the clan etc. I knew someday my prehistory class would come in handy!
My ancestors came to the U.S. from Europe by boat, and were off-loaded at Ellis Island, where they were examined and processed by the federal government before being released into the U.S.
No walking across open borders. No sneaking in.
What’s your point. My ancestors did too. They also crossed a border into a foreign sovereign country and set up shop without permission.
Secured borders. Mass deportations. Zero tolerance for illegals, aliens, migrants, etc. All of this is part of national security.
Prime Deportations, brought to you by Bozos.
Happy Liberation Day! Can’t wait to check my 401k later.
How did it do?
Catching up on the news from yesterday and saw someone say that you need to file an answer in response to a pro se informal brief. To hopefully save our question-asker some time: You don’t actually need to file an answering brief in pro se appeals unless the Court orders a response. (RIP your billables) See NRAP 46A(c) (“An opposing party is not required to respond to documents, including briefs, filed by a party appearing pro se unless ordered to do so by the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals.”); NRAP 31 (d)(2) (“A respondent who fails to timely file an answering brief will not be heard at oral argument unless the court grants permission, and such failure may be treated as a confession of error. Unless the court has ordered the respondent to file an answering brief as provided in Rule 46A(c), this Rule does not apply to appeals in which the appellant is not represented by counsel.”)
If the court does order an answering brief, then yes, you still need to do everything required under NRAP 28(b).
I heard an Alien v. Predator theory that was pretty interesting. If illegal aliens want to stay in America, they have to sucessfully track and detain 5 child predators.
Then what do we do when half of Congress in in prison?