- law dawg
- 71 Comments
- 2753 Views
One of our readers wants to know how long you have been practicing and how many trials you have done? While you’re at it, are you practicing civil or criminal law? How does one go about getting trial experience if they want it? When talking about trial experience do you count short trials, administrative hearings, or arbitrations that take less than a day? Can you be a good litigator without ever getting to trial? What if you settle everything before trial? What are your thoughts on trial experience? Is that a dealbreaker when you’re hiring? What are the requirements for calling yourself a trial lawyer?
Practicing 20 years. About 35-40 trials. All civil.
Practicing 25+ years — civil litigation. 110 civil jury trials in both state and federal court.
Tough question because does trial include short trials? That clarification will move the numbers quite a bit.
14 years in civil litigation. 4 jury trials, 6 or 7 bench trials, 2 short trials, and numerous court mandated arbitrations. Trial experience is important to get over the fear of going to trial. I’ve seen a lot of attorneys on the defense side over value a case because they are afraid of the unknown of a jury trial.
Dear Tyler Technologies: I have had it with you and “Access denied. It looks like this email address does not have access to download this document.” I am the person who filed or served the document. Sure there is a work around for E-File documents in that I can log into either Attorney Corner on the District Court side or Justice Court partner on the LVJC side. But for e-served documents, there is no work around.
What imaginary problem did they think they were solving by adding this meaningless step?
Does the Justice Court partner on the LVJC site give you access to filed documents in justice court like the Portal does for district court? If so, how would I get an account with that service? I don’t do a lot in justice court but when I do I find it a PITA to have to send my runner to get docs from the clerk.
Yes. Fill out an application from the Justice Court Clerk’s office. You have to hand deliver them a check.
Perfect thanks. Of course, they want you to do it in person!
Because its 1998. . . . .
Last time I tried about a couple of years ago, the justice court clerk had no idea what I was talking about. So what’s the name of the form and what are the magic words for the incantation to get the desired access?
So here is the deal– contact LVJC Court Administration. The Clerks will have no idea what you are talking about.
Its called a Jedi Mind Trick and you don’t have the midi-chlorian count sufficient to command the power of the force.
Sure seems like it.
What does this gobbledygook even mean? There is ZERO security enhancement, as I posted a few days ago, when you literally give the answer in the service email. The explanation for the change makes no sense.
We are modifying the way electronically filed records and documents are surfaced to provide an enhanced level of protection. As part of this enhancement, we have added an additional step when a user wishes to view a document.
When attempting to download and view a document from a link within an email notification (submitted, accepted, service, etc.) or from within an electronic filing service provider, users will now see a screen asking them to enter their email address. When you encounter this screen, please enter your email address and click the “Validate” button. The system will confirm your email address before allowing you to download and view the document.
Except as I am sure you noted, it does not work. You cannot validate even the filer? Shameful.
I literally paid $18 to obtain a copy of a Complaint in LA Superior Court. $1 for the search and $17 for the copies. This is as an Attorney account. So no freebees for attorneys. Will Clark County go the way of LA County and charge an arm and a leg for these documents?
THIS morning.
LA Superior is insanely expensive. Another way that PACER, though deeply flawed, is the best platform of its type.
And also improperly expensive, given the class action lawsuit filed over PACER fees.
Family law is different – literally several hundred bench trials over 23 years.
I’ve done a few family and gship trials, and ANYTHING GOES lol.
U r correct
36 years, roughly 30 jury trials, 4-6 bench trials, and a couple of short trials.
Practicing 16 years. No jury trials, 5 bankruptcy court bench trials (non-dischargeability APs), ~40-50 arbitration hearings, a couple short trials, 4 civil bench trials, 30-40 family court “trials” (custody evidentiary hearings and financial/asset trials most at a half-day each, a few one day.) I’m intimidated by the idea of a jury trial, mostly because I’ve never done one and they seem to take so damn long.
Join a DAs office if you want trials. Trials were out of date 20 years ago when I was in law school. Too much risk. That said, I do love a no-risk trial, in the sense that a client demands trial or the other party won’t even come close to reasonable settlement.
I’ve done 5 criminal jury trials and 5 civil jury trials. Countless misdo trials and prelims from my DA days, and countless arbitrations from my civil work, all of which are a great way to get comfortable with evidence.
Oh, and depos, hundreds and hundreds of depos, another good way to learn how to ask questions that get a response, even though you won’t’ learn anything about evidence.
Practicing 14 years. No jury trials. No bench trials. I almost had a probate evidentiary hearing, but the other side didn’t show up at the calendar call, and may in fact have killed herself when she got the sanction order granting my fees and costs.
So, there’s that.
Almost the same here except I’ve had a few bench trials and administrative agency trials. It’s a little disheartening. I’ve been to jury selection several times and each time the other side makes an offer we can’t refuse.
6 years. 2 Bench trials. 1 family law trial. 1 evidentiary hearing. Probably 50-60 depositions (12 in one case lol).
Probate mafia being called on the carpet. https://www.reviewjournal.com/investigations/profiting-off-the-dead-selling-homes-through-probate-court-can-be-lucrative-business-2986851/?utm_campaign=widget&utm_medium=topnews&utm_source=homepage&utm_term=Profiting%20off%20the%20dead%3A%20Selling%20homes%20through%20probate%20court%20can%20be%20lucrative%20business
This is not a pro-Telles response. But this is a big part of what German was working on when the Telles events occurred.
Also not a pro-Telles response. The truth is stranger than fiction. It will be interesting to see if there’s any merit to Telles’ allegations of being framed by these crooks. Home flippers certainly would have the ability to hide evidence in drywall.
Yeah but can they drive Telles’ car to German’s house and put German’s DNA under Telles’ fingernails?
It’s house flippers, not the CIA.
Agreed. It’s either the CIA or a desperate captain of a crooked ship taking the whole boat down with him.
The rumor is that Telles was blowing the whistle because he had his own scheme to feed houses to his own connected people. Schemes dont like competition.
Telles has video of himself being framed that DA doesn’t know about yet. The DA’s case is about to implode. Telles will walk and celebrate with his family. He’s going to bring a defamation claim against German’s family after he’s freed.
The only framing Telles was involved with was his portrait at Michaels
Just like OJ searched for the real killer.
“This is not a scheme, we have been doing this for a long time.” lol
Clear Counsel is going to have some ‘splaining.
Also looks like a few solos. Low hanging fruit for bar counsel.
Hahahaha u got that right!
Man if I could tell what I encountered with those guys without the comment getting deleted…. Would be interesting to say the least.
Same. Interesting that LKP wasn’t identified.
Or Grant Morris Dodds. Interview them without inquiring if there is stickiness on their digits.
Sounds very similar to the Public Administrator scandals of several years ago. This is also not a pro-Telles response!
Interesting to me that this has been going on and, based on the comments, it’s been going for a long time. OBC spends their time persecuting solos who get reported by a disgruntled opposing attorney rather than investigating real, actual fraud that does real, actual damage to the community.
It has gone on far too long. If you report this to OBC, they will tell you that they won’t do anything until the perp is arrested. Anyone else get a similar response?
What evidence of fraud or actual damage to the community did you get from the article?
Fraud is telling the court you made “concerted efforts” to locate the heirs when you intentionally did not locate the heirs. Fraud is also when you don’t name heirs in petitions. Fraud and damage is telling the court and the bank that the property is valueless when you flip hundreds of them for substantial profits, albeit, poorly concealed by non-arms length straw buyers and shell companies. Fraud is when your entire firm’s business model relies upon stealing dead people’s houses and ripping off their heirs. If you didn’t see evidence in that article, look at the list of firms to see if you’re on it.
Fraud is telling the court, the heirs and the lender that the house is worthless and then selling it to Avi Segal who miraculously finds value that you could not see.
14 years experience. 6 jury trials – all civil. Handful of arbs/short trials early on but I rarely have those types of cases anymore. I would love to go to trial more often, but insurance companies don’t like it.
as to getting trial experience – if I find out anyone in my office is heading to trial, I volunteer to help in any way I can even if I’m just writing trial briefs behind the scenes. I have found that if you make yourself reliable in trial crunches, you get asked to go to trial as a second chair at least.
I don’t evaluate a potential hire for the number of trials, but evaluate their willingness to go and jump in the fire when trial is looming.
Seven years: a couple labor arbitrations, one multiday administrative hearing that was basically a bench trial with relaxed evidentiary rules and one evidentiary hearing that involved live witnesses. No true trials, which is fine by me.
10 years in, 5 short trials, countless arbitrations, and 5 exempt trials. I do believe short trials count, and would argue they are even harder than exempt trials due to the time limit. i cut m teeth in short trials before i did an exempt trial. i found that exempt trial was MUCH EASIER since i actually had time to present my case and ask my questions, whereas in short trial the clock was ticking and ever word i muttered mattered and needed to be useful.
Who is a worse human being Telles or Larimer?
presuming all allegations against both are true, Telles. Larimer was a dumb kid in the first DUI, and just (grossly) negligent in the second. Mens rea for intent lacking. Telles however, had pre meditated intent. you dont case someone’s house for shits and giggles
Good points
unless you’re trying to steal their house when they die.
I think dui guy bc he keeps doing it.
want civil trial experience? I think you have to go to government. There’s very rarely a cost justification for trial working at an hourly defense firm.
I had an associate leave my firm to go government because she said that representing real people was too hard on the soul. If she represented the government, it was nameless and faceless and winning and losing did not matter.
OP here. If she wanted nameless and faceless go to ID. I worked govt and found the govt workers were often pretty invested emotionally to it all. But I guess comparatively I see the point.
33 years of practice. 2 civil jury trials, 4 bench trials, 175 administrative hearings with evidence, witness testimony, and court appellate review. Also, fwiw, 2 oral arguments before NV SCt and 1 before 9th Circuit panel.
Does anyone have precedent (civil) to support the notion that a recording/writing in a foreign language cannot be admitted into evidence without a certified translator translating it?
(In other words, needing precedent to support the notion that one side cannot offer a recording into evidence and also offer their own translation of what they say the foreign words mean).
NRS 50.054 precludes anyone from acting as a translator if they’re personally interested in the litigation – kinda similar to what you’re looking for.
Even though you’re looking for civil cases, I think Baltazar-Monterrosa might be persuasive, especially with the lack of other instructive case law:
“Interpreters are subject to qualification as experts,14 and an expert may testify to matters within the scope of his or her special knowledge.15 “The district court has discretion to determine the admissibility of expert testimony, and we review this decision for a clear abuse of discretion.”16 “The question of an interpreter’s competence is a factual one for the trial court.”17 In making this determination, the trial court is given considerable latitude, and absent a manifest abuse of discretion, its ruling will not be disturbed on appeal.18
9
10
In evaluating the translation of testimony, a reviewing court asks whether the translation was adequate and accurate on the whole.19 “Translation is an art more than a science, and there is no such thing as a perfect translation of a defendant’s testimony. Indeed, in every case there will be room for disagreement among expert translators over some aspects of the translation.”20 “A defendant bears the burden of proving that the translation was inadequate.”
Baltazar-Monterrosa v. State, 122 Nev. 606, 614, 137 P.3d 1137, 1142 (2006)
I had to pay for a certified translation of medical records from a less-common language to English. It was a couple of hundred pages. Get ready to open up your wallet is all I can say.
Court just sent an email blast that it’s using Zoom moving forward.
Yay we still have remote hearings!
Have you looked at the Department instructions? Rolls out Monday and is a mess.
Shocking.
You want better settlements in personal injury, then you must go to trial. Even if you lose, you earn
Respect. With commercial litigation it is not as important, but you need to know how to introduce evidence properly and actually get proper testimony by controlling the witness with your questions. Everyone thinks it is easy, but the correct wording for important questions are important.
20 years of practice. 30 civil jury trials, 20 criminal trials but very early in practice and only a few were jury trials as many were DUI or other misdemeanors.
The higher risk the case for you as the attorney the scarier the trial. When you do personal injury you are putting up your own money. How would you feel betting $100,000 in costs on a case? Just as nervous if you bet $100,000 on the lions this weekend.