Highly Unlikely

  • Law

  • There are allegations of extortion in the Badlands golf course development matter by the developers against Frank Schreck. [RJ]
  • The We The People competition starts this weekend and features an all-star lineup of local judges and officials. [eighthjdcourt blog]
  • Is the stadium deal dead in the water? [TNI]
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 2, 2017 5:56 pm

Good opinion by Supreme Court today.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 2, 2017 6:37 pm

Please, Lord Sheldon, do not revive that Stadium deal. I don't want to pick up the tab when the room tax falls short!

If this thing doesn't come back to life, Mark Davis looks like a complete moron. Now he has to go back to Oakland with his tail between his legs.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 2, 2017 10:08 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Yes. Please let this idiotic stadium proposal die. No offense to Lords Adelson and Wynn, but the peasants are tired over every escalating demands for dues. I till the land all day and can barely keep a roof over my family. If the market supports a stadium, the market will find a way to make it happen without taking even more from me.

anonymous
Guest
anonymous
February 2, 2017 11:32 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Amen. Now get back to work.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 2, 2017 11:46 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Adelson, please give me some bread!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 3, 2017 5:59 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Let them eat cake

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 2, 2017 7:17 pm
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 2, 2017 9:23 pm

Another attorney accused of wrong doing, no way! Bar counsel, where were ya? Ah, chasing people down over pennies. Ha!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 3, 2017 12:00 am

1:23, What case/attorney are you talking about?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 3, 2017 12:26 am
Reply to  Anonymous

I assume he is talking about Frank Schreck, although the allegations in that article don't seem to be something the bar would likely look into.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 3, 2017 12:50 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Today's headlines, F. Schreck.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 3, 2017 1:05 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Are you serious 1:23? The flimsiest pile of crap. If you believe everything in the article, Schreck stated that the land should remain open space. That is the Queensridge parties' entire argument– it is required to remain open space. None of the foregoing (even if it was true) constitutes extortion under NRS 205.320. This is the most bogus piece of crap argument and yet the R/J is willing to publish it because it gets attention.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 3, 2017 1:08 am
Reply to  Anonymous

it says "accused" take it up with the RJ

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 3, 2017 1:09 am
Reply to  Anonymous

I need me some F. Schreck bread.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
February 3, 2017 1:41 am

There as some people on this blog who need to have a Trump melt down. Some of you are some uptight fucks.