Based on years of representing sex workers, there is a price to be paid for earning a living that way, even if what they’re doing is legal. It warps them emotionally and robs them of their ability to engage in true loving human relationships. They develop a deep and permanent contempt for people. And they have emotional problems long after they’re able to make a living that way.
Maybe this girl can handle it; but I haven’t seen good outcomes.
I once represented a prostitute/bank robber named Amy. I really liked her and felt sorry for her. I got her off the bank robbery charge and I still worry about what happened to her. The above summary I believe to be accurate.
So what 10:51 is saying is that she will have the same attitude as most male attorneys. Honestly people. Uritta just got “Attaboy”s on this blog for siphoning off $1.3 million from the mother of a dead prisoner but this woman gets infantilized for syphoning off money from hormonal men? This is so dumb.
@11:30– no way the state paid $1.3 million in atty fees unless they are handing money out for political favors. So there had to be an agreement between the P and P’s atty.
Being annoyed by the stupidity is not the same as hate. There’s a big difference between likely tricked street prostitutes and a law student who dabbles in Only Fans. She’s making far more money than many of you, which leads me to think you are simply jealous.
In actuality, she doesn’t even make nude content, just shakes her ass in tight dresses. Simp men line up with their wallets out. Can’t really blame her when she’s makes tens of thousands of dollars to do dumb tiktok dances.
Guest
Anonymous
October 16, 2025 10:03 am
The No Kings protests are idiotic. They accomplish absolutely nothing. We don’t have a king now and won’t have a king the day after.
The goofballs attending these “protests” are the same people that shamed others.people for not wearing masks, not social distancing and not getting vaccinated. No kings my ass.
I’m anti-king in the US and I love to protest so I think the protest will foster a community of like-minded individuals and the press is already covering it so it will let like-minded people in other places know we agree and support this issue. Kings just let the power go to their head and end up suing people who disagree with they say and kicking people out of the country they don’t like and other bad stuff. Surprised this is controversial.
The patriots who were also antifa and were also all secret FBI agents who were all pardoned.
Guest
Anonymous
October 16, 2025 11:09 am
The Golden Knights put out a statement that goalie Carter Hart will be joining their organization. https://www.nhl.com/goldenknights/news/statement-from-the-vegas-golden-knights. Hart is controversial because of an incident of alleged sexual assault that involved several Hockey Canada players (including Brett Howden who was also on that team). Charges only went forward against 5 players–including Hart. Hart testified at the trial and admitted being in the room and getting a “blowie” from the woman. He also could not remember a lot of the other details. Ultimately, the trial determined that none of the players were guilty of sexual assault. Naturally, there are arguments that the police botched the investigation and that limited the Crown’s case against the players.
Anyway, now VGK are letting him join the organization. I’m torn about it because people deserve second chances in life, but I also don’t condone sexual assault. Lots of people probably have stories from their past that might be offensive to someone else, so where do we draw the line. This woman alleges she was assaulted and did not consent to what happened in the room full of hockey players. For me it’s a tough call on how to respond to this. What do you all think?
I think we need to know a lot more about what actually occurred. I have not read the articles on this, but saw a news report that they were acquitted more than once and re-tried. Is that true? Also, wasn’t there a video that showed consent or cleared some of them?
https://people.com/law-student-makes-1-million-a-year-posting-adult-content-exclusive-11827374
Thoughts?
My snarky thoughts:
– would.
– BK hottie is going to have some competition
My real thoughts:
– Good for her. Do what you want.
Certainly agree with the “do what you want” part.
Based on years of representing sex workers, there is a price to be paid for earning a living that way, even if what they’re doing is legal. It warps them emotionally and robs them of their ability to engage in true loving human relationships. They develop a deep and permanent contempt for people. And they have emotional problems long after they’re able to make a living that way.
Maybe this girl can handle it; but I haven’t seen good outcomes.
I once represented a prostitute/bank robber named Amy. I really liked her and felt sorry for her. I got her off the bank robbery charge and I still worry about what happened to her. The above summary I believe to be accurate.
So what 10:51 is saying is that she will have the same attitude as most male attorneys. Honestly people. Uritta just got “Attaboy”s on this blog for siphoning off $1.3 million from the mother of a dead prisoner but this woman gets infantilized for syphoning off money from hormonal men? This is so dumb.
Those fees likely didn’t come out of the award. Rather, from the Defendant.
@11:30– no way the state paid $1.3 million in atty fees unless they are handing money out for political favors. So there had to be an agreement between the P and P’s atty.
11:25 hates male attorneys
Being annoyed by the stupidity is not the same as hate. There’s a big difference between likely tricked street prostitutes and a law student who dabbles in Only Fans. She’s making far more money than many of you, which leads me to think you are simply jealous.
Just read more of the article. She is in Twitch, not Only Fans and she doesn’t even get nude. She’s brilliant.
Dad died at 15. Needed a way to pay for college and law school. It’s just like many other lawyers’ stories, just with extra toe pics.
Gotta pay for those UMich bills somehow.
In actuality, she doesn’t even make nude content, just shakes her ass in tight dresses. Simp men line up with their wallets out. Can’t really blame her when she’s makes tens of thousands of dollars to do dumb tiktok dances.
The No Kings protests are idiotic. They accomplish absolutely nothing. We don’t have a king now and won’t have a king the day after.
If they accomplish absolutely nothing, they are not worth the energy and attention you put into your comment.
Oh, it is always worth the energy to make fun of stupid people like the No Kings protestors.
The goofballs attending these “protests” are the same people that shamed others.people for not wearing masks, not social distancing and not getting vaccinated. No kings my ass.
I’m anti-king in the US and I love to protest so I think the protest will foster a community of like-minded individuals and the press is already covering it so it will let like-minded people in other places know we agree and support this issue. Kings just let the power go to their head and end up suing people who disagree with they say and kicking people out of the country they don’t like and other bad stuff. Surprised this is controversial.
Just curious, are there any protests you find not idiotic? If so, could you name a few?
The protestors he agrees with, of course. Like the patriots on January 6.
The patriots who were also antifa and were also all secret FBI agents who were all pardoned.
The Golden Knights put out a statement that goalie Carter Hart will be joining their organization. https://www.nhl.com/goldenknights/news/statement-from-the-vegas-golden-knights. Hart is controversial because of an incident of alleged sexual assault that involved several Hockey Canada players (including Brett Howden who was also on that team). Charges only went forward against 5 players–including Hart. Hart testified at the trial and admitted being in the room and getting a “blowie” from the woman. He also could not remember a lot of the other details. Ultimately, the trial determined that none of the players were guilty of sexual assault. Naturally, there are arguments that the police botched the investigation and that limited the Crown’s case against the players.
Anyway, now VGK are letting him join the organization. I’m torn about it because people deserve second chances in life, but I also don’t condone sexual assault. Lots of people probably have stories from their past that might be offensive to someone else, so where do we draw the line. This woman alleges she was assaulted and did not consent to what happened in the room full of hockey players. For me it’s a tough call on how to respond to this. What do you all think?
Not guilty
I think this public warning for women and girls not to be in confined spaces with his is helpful.
I think we need to know a lot more about what actually occurred. I have not read the articles on this, but saw a news report that they were acquitted more than once and re-tried. Is that true? Also, wasn’t there a video that showed consent or cleared some of them?
They were acquitted once. There were two consent videos taken AFTER the incident. In one, she was asked if she was “okay with this.”
Hart’s role in the incident was asking for a “blowie.” He then went up to the victim, pulled his pants down and got a “blowie.”