- law dawg
- 17 Comments
- 2576 Views
- Former Wynn cocktail server awarded $321.2K after trial. [RJ]
- Robert Telles moved to High Desert State Prison. [8NewsNow]
- Reno pastor endorses Republicans in violation of IRS rules. [TNI]
- What else is happening out there today?
Hey, High Heels, haven’t you heard of the internet, cell phones, FaceBook, etc., Ferris Bueller’s Day Off was filmed in 1986. You’re lucky I wasn’t on the jury, I would have ordered you to pay Wynn’s attorney’s fees.
Bueller – my favorite
Off topic, but SCOTUS rejected the man on bonanza’s petition on the Falconi writ opinion. Looks like family court shall remain open to public scrutiny. Haha Enjoy the loss, buddy.
I like to call him the Wizard on Bonanza. Good to know.
#FightTheCabal The more transparency the more all will see the rotten underbelly of the system that hurts children. It’s truly a divorce industry fueled by the cabal.
The records should be public. But because they were sealed as a matter of course for so long, no one worried about redacting personal information (mainly personal info re children). They need to do better with this issue.
No way. Either you’re a member of the cabal or you don’t practice family law. The judges in family court literally give child rapists unsupervised access to children. How can you even suggest that the public should not know about that? How are voters supposed to know who to vote for when their dirty deeds are kept under seal? Media access orders can be tailored to meet the needs of the case without letting those judges hide behind record sealing. The ONLY answer currently available is public access. Until there is a complete overhaul of the family court system, this is the only way the public has the ability to review the actions of our elected judges.
@10:50 11:03 here…I obviously misread your comment so my response is a little off base. I get what you’re saying. This exact issue came up with FDFs a few years ago. The court clerk has the ability to seal certain kinds of docs/filings system-wide. There are also rules in place that SSNs, bank accounts, etc are to be redacted before filing. Many attorneys do not/did not comply with those rules. I’ve even had an attorney file a CPS report as an exhibit. So, yes, they do need to do better, but we cannot let that argument justify keeping the status qu in place.
Don’t forget the OBC is part of the cabal and even their process of screening grievances is “confidential.” Think every non-cabal lawyer doesn’t look like the proverbial indictable ham sandwich? You’re naive.
which is the case name on this?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110424zor_8mjp.pdf
Yet more evidence that nothing good ever happens at a gender reveal party.
If gender is fluid, how can it be revealed before birth? How can a non-human even have a gender? I’m waiting for Kamala to explain.
For the down voters, prove my statements illogical.
Your argument is made in bad faith.
Hahaha ok u win that round
Op here I agree I was trying to show how illogical the liberal position is