Since you are hammering on the Administration, I suppose it is fair to point out that common sense seems to have evaporated in some federal district courts.
I’m glad I don’t work with you. I can tell it’s just a lot of these dumb snarky comments
Guest
Anonymous
July 8, 2026 10:39 am
Re the squatters, correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t changing the name on the mailbox and utilities helpful for establishing your adverse possession claim?
I think changing the name on the mailbox and utilities would be evidence for both the “actual possession” and “open and notorious” elements. I hope my property professor isn’t reading this.
There is a guy on Instagram who will go in and “out squat” the squatters and make their lives hell. Anyone can draft a false lease, so he will do that and then claim ownership rights just like they have done and cops will not do anything to him, just like they won’t with the real squatters, but it is a “civil matter.” The owner should get a professional to go in and out squat the squatters and get her house back.
It’s because owners have historically been pretty atrocious assholes to renters that self-help became outlawed.
Hiring the modern day equivalent of the Pinkertons doesn’t help the owner’s case.
Guest
Anonymous
July 8, 2026 1:20 pm
I’m mostly familiar with bigamy in the Sister Wives/Big Love context. Seeing it as a means of committing fraud is pretty creative. Wonder how much she ended up getting away with from all these different victims? Also, how in God’s name did NOBODY at the marriage license bureau notice she was a such a repeat customer?
I am not a member of that affiliated religious group. But to be fair, neither Sister Wives or the Big Love script described bigamy which is the attempt to be legally married to more than one person. Legally married to one; relationships with multiple people. Also consensual relationships. This case was deceptive fraud.
They aren’t legally married to all the spouses except for one and that is what helps the RLDS and other groups commit welfare fraud. On paper, they are single mothers with tons of kids and no income so they qualify for every kind of aid there is. They get their monthly deposit for food stamps for example, go to the compound “store” and “buy” that amount of groceries. The transaction goes straight to the dear leader and no one is the wiser. They justify this fraud by saying they are “bleeding the beast.” Like it is a kind of civil disobedience. At least this is what they used to do. I hope after the warran jeffs thing people got wise.
Interesting. I’ve never heard the term “bleeding the beast” before. Clever set-up..Thanks for sharing.
Guest
Anonymous
July 8, 2026 8:00 pm
The Chen marriage-fraud case is, at bottom, a domestic-relations matter the criminal side has no business swallowing. A dozen valid Nevada marriages is a dozen community estates – each with its own division, each properly billed as a separate file. Any competent practitioner reading this should be counting twelve engagement letters, not one plea. In forty years I have never seen a fraud prosecution that couldn’t have been a very lucrative dissolution instead. The prosecutors, predictably, took the small view.
I don’t see anything in your post about being AV-rated, nor any reference to preeminence. Thank you for your input but this is a blog for real attorneys, not poseurs.
How ironic that the party of “law and order” is brazenly ignoring federal court orders.
Laws for thee, not for me.
Since you are hammering on the Administration, I suppose it is fair to point out that common sense seems to have evaporated in some federal district courts.
Last time I checked a federal agency (all federal agencies) was not a party of anything other than its own bureaucracy.
7:49 I’m not sure when it was that you last “checked” but please stop playing dumb
I’m glad I don’t work with you. I can tell it’s just a lot of these dumb snarky comments
Re the squatters, correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t changing the name on the mailbox and utilities helpful for establishing your adverse possession claim?
I think changing the name on the mailbox and utilities would be evidence for both the “actual possession” and “open and notorious” elements. I hope my property professor isn’t reading this.
Less helpful: producing a lease, even a falsified one.
They would also have to pay the taxes for the 5 year period they are occupying the house which I doubt they are doing.
There is a guy on Instagram who will go in and “out squat” the squatters and make their lives hell. Anyone can draft a false lease, so he will do that and then claim ownership rights just like they have done and cops will not do anything to him, just like they won’t with the real squatters, but it is a “civil matter.” The owner should get a professional to go in and out squat the squatters and get her house back.
It’s because owners have historically been pretty atrocious assholes to renters that self-help became outlawed.
Hiring the modern day equivalent of the Pinkertons doesn’t help the owner’s case.
I’m mostly familiar with bigamy in the Sister Wives/Big Love context. Seeing it as a means of committing fraud is pretty creative. Wonder how much she ended up getting away with from all these different victims? Also, how in God’s name did NOBODY at the marriage license bureau notice she was a such a repeat customer?
I am not a member of that affiliated religious group. But to be fair, neither Sister Wives or the Big Love script described bigamy which is the attempt to be legally married to more than one person. Legally married to one; relationships with multiple people. Also consensual relationships. This case was deceptive fraud.
They aren’t legally married to all the spouses except for one and that is what helps the RLDS and other groups commit welfare fraud. On paper, they are single mothers with tons of kids and no income so they qualify for every kind of aid there is. They get their monthly deposit for food stamps for example, go to the compound “store” and “buy” that amount of groceries. The transaction goes straight to the dear leader and no one is the wiser. They justify this fraud by saying they are “bleeding the beast.” Like it is a kind of civil disobedience. At least this is what they used to do. I hope after the warran jeffs thing people got wise.
RLDS! Hahaha!
That Staci Cramm is up to no good out there in Missouri!
Interesting. I’ve never heard the term “bleeding the beast” before. Clever set-up..Thanks for sharing.
The Chen marriage-fraud case is, at bottom, a domestic-relations matter the criminal side has no business swallowing. A dozen valid Nevada marriages is a dozen community estates – each with its own division, each properly billed as a separate file. Any competent practitioner reading this should be counting twelve engagement letters, not one plea. In forty years I have never seen a fraud prosecution that couldn’t have been a very lucrative dissolution instead. The prosecutors, predictably, took the small view.
I don’t see anything in your post about being AV-rated, nor any reference to preeminence. Thank you for your input but this is a blog for real attorneys, not poseurs.
ROFL *dead*
I’m really sad I missed “AV rating day” at Boyd now 😂
I am considered preeminent on the BBQ though.
Why not both?