Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah

  • Law

  • Judge Jennifer Dorsey sentenced “Vegas Dave” Oancea to three years probation during which he must stay out of Las Vegas sports books. [RJ]
  • From a press release:

Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro, of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, is pleased to announce that Elayna J. Youchah has been selected to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of the Honorable George W. Foley, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge in Las Vegas,Nevada.  Judge Foley will be retiring August 5, 2019.

Ms. Youchah has been an Equity Partner at Jackson Lewis since 2009. Prior to working for Jackson Lewis, she was an Equity Partner at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck; a Partner at Schreck Brignone; an Associate at Morrison & Forester; and, a law clerk for the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. Ms. Youchah received her law degree from the University of Southern California, graduating Order of the Coif; her Master of Social Work from the University of Washington; and, her Bachelor of Arts from the University of Michigan.

Ms. Youchah will assume the position of a United States Magistrate Judge on August 6, 2019. The term of appointment is eight years.

27 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 3:39 pm

I am sure she will be a fine Judge, but can men still be appointed to be a judge?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 4:18 pm

Men are no longer eligible to be appointed to anything.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 5:30 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Steve Sisolak just appointed Steve Cohen to the Nevada Gaming Commission and Dan Albregts is the next federal magistrate judge, but feel free to continue with your dramatics.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 4:30 pm

When I first started practicing in the 80's District Judge Miriam Shearing was the only female judge, on any court in the county.

So, obviously, the pendulum needed to swing in the direction of adding significantly more female jurists. But some suggest it has swung too far in the other direction.

One reason may be that the public, as well as the media, still assume that females are not proportionately and fairly represented on the bench.

Perhaps if they realized that more than half our judges are now female, gender would no longer be the huge factor it is. That said, there are certain factions that would want to populate the bench with as many females as possible even though they are aware that females are more numerous than males in the Nevada Courts. So, there are those political, and other, considerations.

I don't believe that in this day and age, based on the training of attorneys, that it makes any difference what the gender is. Some people used to say that men tend to be "tougher" as judges, when that is called for, and that such can be a good thing. But for every tough and firm male judge, there is a female judge who is just as tough.

On the other hand, some people have claimed that female judges can be more "sensitive" than men, when that trait is called for. But for every sensitive and caring female judge, I can identify a male judge just as sensitive.

Also, of my half dozen favorite District Court Judges, three happen to be female, and three are male. And the same break down goes for my six least favorite District Court Judges.

So, as a practical matter, the operations of the bench appear completely unaffected based on the gender composition of the bench. So, it is something that makes no real practical difference to attorneys and litigants. But for the media and various political factions, the gender issue in appointments still looms large

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 5:57 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Sure, that's what a reverse sexist would say.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 6:02 pm

Appoint only those who are mid-transition, problem solved.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 7:25 pm

What is Nelson Cohen up to?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 8:05 pm

To: 10:57. Don't think that 9:30 sounds like either a sexist or a reverse sexist. Sounds like the poster offered a fair analysis. That said, I could be wrong. After all, these days if we don't agree with 100% of what someone says, we are supposed to call them names like "racist", etc.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 8:32 pm

1:05–These days,if we don't agree with someone 100%, we are not limited to calling them "racist." We can also call them "sexist."

This new climate is really interesting(and oppressive). A decade or two ago a public figure would occasionally say the most outrageously racist, horrible things. And when eventually forced to apologize, it would be a non-apology–i.e. I'm sorry if there is anyone so thin-skinned and hyper-sensitive that they took offense to what I said.

But nowadays a pubic figure can make the most innocuous, seemingly inoffensive remark, but if someone decides to over-react a thousand fold to such remark, the public figure gushes, scrapes, begs for forgiveness, enters sensitivity training, etc.

Well, brave new world I guess.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 8:43 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Have ya seen our President?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 9:01 pm

I assumed 10:57 was making a joke. And it was a very effective joke, because obviously it's rooted in reality.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 10:39 pm

The only rule I can go with is that we should all be able to speak freely. Like most people, I have things that are touchy for me e.g., my dad died an alcoholic, I once got ghosted by a new wife, etc. but if I go to a comedy show and Dave Chappelle does a bot about being left at the alter or the alcoholism, well, the whole world cannot stop laughing because of my touchiness. I once saw a Youtube video where a person went nuts because the comedian joked about deafness (he had a deaf wife in reality) and the person found it offensive. C'mon. True story, believe me or don't. My best friend in college was black in the 80s (I'm white) and once we got past all the jokes (I can't dance, etc.) we became very close because, in part, it was so obvious we could say anything that it became too easy or nonsensical or passe, but if we would have ignored the issue for years who knows. It's sort of like, as I ramble, that we just got it out of our system and became very close friends. A friendship I now attribute to helping me truly not be a prejudiced person. It's like we went past it. So as I ramble on, if you can't take a joke or are offended so easily, you should question where that sensitivity is coming from and how it will hold you back possibly.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 10:49 pm

This is your daily reminder that the State Bar sucks. Have a nice day!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 11:54 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

How could I ever forget?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 21, 2019 11:58 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

I did not need to be told that.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 12:06 am
Reply to  Anonymous

But is says have a nice day!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 12:17 am

I cannot believe the reply brief we are about to file right now. It is a piece of shit.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 12:20 am
Reply to  Anonymous

I love these kinds of comments.

You are in my thoughts and prayers, 5:17. You will laugh heartily when you win anyway.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 12:28 am
Reply to  Anonymous

aah… the need for billable hours pushes a lot of crap in the courts.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 5:34 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Funny. I've been working on some oppositions this week. My assistant has got to be so sick of me swearing at the morons who wrote these motions. And yes, they are bill-by-the-hour types.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 5:11 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

Hey 5:17, I just read your "brief", and your suspicions were correct – it sucks! Expect an EDCR 7.60 and Rule 11 motion and letter to your inbox post haste!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 3:42 am
Reply to  Anonymous

I think she is hot. And smart

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 4:45 am
Reply to  Anonymous

It's an ad. What do you want us to say?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 4:21 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

BFF? That is a little childish.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 4:22 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

I think if your Ad and website prominently discusses your Webmaster, you have gone down the wrong path.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
May 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

I think if you're going to prominently feature a trademark on your website, to the point where you feel it's important enough to mark with a "TM," you should probably ensure the trademark hasn't been abandoned since 2015 according to the USPTO.