Retroactive Review

  • Law

  • A look at asset forfeiture and where those monies go. [RJ]
  • Here is Jane Ann Morrison’s assessment of judicial races. [RJ]
  • An editorial on why you shouldn’t vote for Catherine Ramsey. [RJ]
  • The US Supreme Court held that the ban on automatic life sentences for juveniles is retroactive. [NPR]
  • Former AG and current senatorial candidate Catherine Cortez-Masto’s husband runs security for two medical marijuana businesses. [Free Beacon]
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
January 25, 2016 9:36 pm

As I recall, the Las Vegas Review Journal gave a wholehearted endorsement to Elizabeth Halverson a few years back. This article make me think I should throw my support and a few bucks to Ramsey. WTF does the RK know about what goes on in District Court anyway?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
January 25, 2016 9:37 pm
Reply to  Anonymous

*RJ

anonymous
Guest
anonymous
January 26, 2016 12:13 am
Reply to  Anonymous

To paraphrase John Nance Garner, the RJ's opinion on who to vote for in a judicial (or any other) election isn't worth a bucket of warm spit.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
January 26, 2016 4:20 am
Reply to  Anonymous

Agreed. Maybe not even that. And what a piece of snark at that.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
January 26, 2016 12:01 am

who wrote the editorial piece, dave thomas?