North Las Vegas City Attorney Sandra Douglass Morgan is jumping into the recall election against Judge Catherine Ramsey. Is that how this works? [Las Vegas Sun]
The new Judge Johnson was shocked to learn that a Vegas man has been locked up for 6 years without a conviction. [RJ]
"'For Mr. Kutner, as for any attorney, professional reputation is a valuable and important factor in developing and maintaining a successful law practice,' according to the new complaint."
That may indeed be true. But don't the comments relative to, and prevailing perception of, Kutner's "professional reputation" speak for themselves? In other words, how can someone's honestly-held opinion regarding Kutner's professional reputation be defamatory? Serious question.
It is doubtful that Kutner will win this lawsuit. And he may in fact draw more attention to the very comments from which he seeks to distance himself. He'd be better served to redouble his level and quality of service toward his clients and the legal community at large. What is the best he can expect by filing lawsuits to remove comments from the internet?
Guest
Anonymous
July 8, 2015 3:51 pm
Can't believe you're linking to that bullshit smear job by Veteran's in Politics. How do I know it's bullshit? Because it doesn't provide any details (party names, date of the hearing, etc.) that would allow a reader to verify the account in the "article." I do not know why so many judges kowtow to that organization, but it makes me think less of every person that goes on the radio show. Khamsi's doing a good job, especially considering what a horror show the civil docket is in Justice Court.
While I probably wouldn't seek VIP's endorsement if running for office, I appreciate you posting the link. VIP provides a service to the community. It is just one perspective, but it creates an opportunity for discussion and allows for a counter-perspective to be voiced when people disagree.
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anoymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unaffraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are.. When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face.. Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anounimous postings..
Judge Bita Khamsi was on the Veterans In Politics Talk Show on June 27th scrawl down to our archived shows and click onto this link at 36:30min onto the show and listen to an explosive interview: Veterans In Politics: 2015-06-27 | Melanie Thomas Co-Host: Guests: Bita Khamsi Las Vegas Justice of the Peace Department 6 and Dr. Walter Hammond Retired Army Veteran to discuss how our rights are being violated under the 14 Amendment of the Constitution – See more at: http://www.vegasallnetradio.com/veterans-in-politics.html#sthash.47mqaHcw.dpuf
Ditto! Veteran's in Politics is a complete joke of an organization. It has a catchy name but is lacking in any real substance. I would be embarrassed to use its endorsement in a campaign.
My favorite part of Veterans in Politics is the Canadian representative. Why is there a Canadian contingent of US veterans presumably involved in Canadian politics? Makes perfect sense for those wing nuts. The crazy dude is Steve Sanson and he's been here before. Bita is an excellent JP who was given a raw deal and has to clean it up, you can't hate her for dealing with that zoo. Samson is just butt hurt he didn't get what he wants.
Anonymous or coward whatever your name is?… We are Veterans In Politics International… Here is the definition for International mostly means something (a company, language, or organization) involving more than a single country. Dummy… What’s your name? When you fight for your country you will be a crazy dude too..
As for Bita Khamsi we will see next year now wont we?
In re: the threat against Judge Khamsi at 1:47 – given the track record of Veterans in Politics for endorsing candidates who fail (Sue Lowden, Benjamin Donion, Amy Groves, etc), I'm placing my bets on Khamsi.
Its funny Anonymous how you can name the candidates that we endorsed who was not successful… How about naming the ones we did endorse and actually elected… I can assure you its 90% more than the ones that never made it… Are you one of the candidates that we didn’t endorse…? You sounded scorned… Anonymous who are YOU? Nothing but a CHICKEN!
Instead of coming to this website and bitching about the fact that those who leave comments are anonymous (which has long been the tradition of the blog), why don't you spend your time cleaning up the Veterans In Politics website. It looks like it was made by a middle school student in 1997.
Instead of hiding it seems like the only thing you know to do based on your experience. Why don't you tell me who you are so it can be a fair discussion chicken shit!
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anoymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unaffraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are.. When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face.. Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anounimous postings..
Stevie is a middle school dropout, which explains the middle school level website. No one needs nor wants your endorsement, idiot. No one would knowingly associate with someone of your caliber. You need help. I would be happy to have Metro lock you up for a day or two for observation of your behavior. Maybe a little electrocution to tame your animal-like behavior.
I agree that Steve doesn't speak for veterans at all, and he disgraces the name when he goes on the attack as "veterans in politics". It's a joke. I've met very few actual veterans or politicians that respect this guy. He is a self promoting criminal trying to make a name for himself so he can run for something coming up. He wants something for nothing, or you end up his enemy and he bashes you on his "show" or spams every Facebook page with his illiterate blog. Learn who your real friends are Steve, because they aren't the reputable veterans groups, and they aren't the reputable politicians.
Guest
Veterans In Politics International
July 8, 2015 8:41 pm
All you cowards that want to hide behind an “Anonymous” name. I have nothing to say to you with the exception of this. We educate and we take on causes and elected officials that you punks run from. By the way we have been doing it since 1993 and on the radio since 2005. We must be doing something right..
Anyone that’s not man or woman enough to identify themselves before they talk crap is projecting their bull crap.. If you want to talk crap about me say it to my face here is my number 702 283 8088 I don’t run nor hide from anyone, I never did and never will. Call it PTSD and thank you for defending your freedoms..
I think the PTSD comments are out of line. Regardless of what Steve's behavior now, he did serve in the military and that act deserves some respect. PTSD is a real ailment that veterans suffer from, not a joke or an insult.
That said, it's my opinion that Steve is a bully. Look at the comments in this thread. Are our elected judges really comfortable associating themselves with someone like this? Apparently so. And that is very sad.
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anoymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unaffraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are.. When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face.. Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anounimous postings..
You are a joke, Stevie. You have mental, physical and social problems and could not make it in any other community. The more you talk, the closer you are to losing whatever respect you had in the community. Boy.
Steve is a good guy. I'd like to see him kick the crap out of someone in a cage match or something. I wouldn't call that Veterans group he helps run a "hack" organization but I enjoy reading his articles. Semper Fi bitches!!!!!!
Steve, I believe everybody appreciates your service, that should not be discounted. But your ad hominem attacks on a judge many of us know and respect diminishes you in our community. I don't know the case at all, but Bita is not one who throws around contempt like you throw around your patriotism. I just wish you'd be more judicious in your opinions, they would be respected more if that was the case. Additionally, many of us do not have the platform to trash individuals that you have and so we would rather avoid losing our jobs and/or getting trashed in various e-mails you send out on a regular basis.
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anoymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unaffraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are.. When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face.. Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anounimous postings..
Fear and a bunch of emotion that sounds as if it came from a 22 year old is about all you are capable of spewing. One of your commanding officers would laugh at you as you have allowed your weaknesses to come through bright and clear. Those same commanders would laugh at your comments related to fear. You are not even close on any count, junior.
You should also educate yourself, as your childish attempts to use the English language effectively have failed miserably. Obviously, you can cut/paste, but please do so with close attention to paragraph and sentence structure, as well as correct spelling and avoidance of run-on sentences, comma splices, missing verbs, etc. BOY.
Hi, Steve! Anonymous works only for those of us who are welcome here. Idiot.
Guest
Anonymous
July 8, 2015 10:35 pm
On an unrelated matter, when you have dbas and akas affiliated with a defendant and you list them on one default, is that default effective as to those dbas and akas?
Thank you for the responses!
DBA's and AKA's are just that — different names for the same legal entity. Assuming your judge knows his/her law, it's the entity's legal/corporate name that needs to be correctly identified, not its 20 to 30 DBA's…
Guest
steve sanson
July 8, 2015 10:44 pm
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anonymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unafraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are… When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face… Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anonymous postings…
3:35 PM asked a very good question about defaulting dbas and akas. This is a great topic because so many of us encounter default issues in our everyday practice. Can anyone please assist 3:35 PM with her important question?
Guest
Anonymous
July 8, 2015 11:24 pm
Steve,
We have many mutual friends IRL. I admire your service in the military and to the community. Let me say a few things to you that come from a loving, but tough place. You need to get it together. Whatever redeeming qualities you have are overshadowed by your boorish, rude behavior. You work so hard, but you're holding yourself back. Self examination can be hard, and sometimes painful. We are all imperfect beings, that's for sure. But might I suggest a moment of introspection where you can be honest with yourself in a way that will let you escape barriers holding you back – barriers that you built? Imagine what you could accomplish if you kept your hard work and zeal and dedication to the community but abandoned your insecurity and the vicious, puerile attacks that flow from it? Just food for thought.
I admire Steve for having the man marbles to go after certain elected officials and judges (Harter, Khamsi, Ochoa, and other bad judges I have read about) with FACTS and calls people out when they appear on his radio program. Go Steve! And I am not Steve Sanson…….but I bet he would approve this message.
Sanson, the same goes for you: if you don't like what's written, leave. Tough. Not everyone or everything is glamorous.
Guest
Anonymous
July 9, 2015 12:25 am
blog is dead
Guest
Anonymous
July 9, 2015 4:38 am
Blog is dead man! We missed you!
Guest
Anonymous
July 9, 2015 6:46 am
I think they should have picked someone who has a background in civil law. Dept. 6 is a CIVIL calendar. Judge Bita Khamsi is still handling it from her wheelhouse, which is criminal, and as a PD for years, at that. No offense, but it IS a different "handle." They should have changed Dept. 6 to a criminal calendar for her, and then given her time to take on a civil calendar so she could continue shadowing the other JP's, which she did for the first few weeks. It takes more time than a few weeks to get into the issues civil cases present, and vice versa for a civil lawyer coming into a criminal calendar.
Doesn't suing your own client qualify under the definition of d-bag. If so, then on my opinion Adam Kutner falls under the definition.
Filing a huge, bogus lien with little or no work performed names you a douche
Makes
"'For Mr. Kutner, as for any attorney, professional reputation is a valuable and important factor in developing and maintaining a successful law practice,' according to the new complaint."
That may indeed be true. But don't the comments relative to, and prevailing perception of, Kutner's "professional reputation" speak for themselves? In other words, how can someone's honestly-held opinion regarding Kutner's professional reputation be defamatory? Serious question.
It is doubtful that Kutner will win this lawsuit. And he may in fact draw more attention to the very comments from which he seeks to distance himself. He'd be better served to redouble his level and quality of service toward his clients and the legal community at large. What is the best he can expect by filing lawsuits to remove comments from the internet?
Can't believe you're linking to that bullshit smear job by Veteran's in Politics. How do I know it's bullshit? Because it doesn't provide any details (party names, date of the hearing, etc.) that would allow a reader to verify the account in the "article." I do not know why so many judges kowtow to that organization, but it makes me think less of every person that goes on the radio show. Khamsi's doing a good job, especially considering what a horror show the civil docket is in Justice Court.
Agreed!
I agree! Steve Sanson's radio show is a joke. Who cares what he thinks? Sanson is a self-promoter and doesn't speak for any of the veterans I know.
I am thrilled to see that a judge had the gumption to put the brakes on the use of contempt in those lower courts.
Does anyone have information on how Veterans in Politics is funded? The whole thing has a creepy vibe to me.
While I probably wouldn't seek VIP's endorsement if running for office, I appreciate you posting the link. VIP provides a service to the community. It is just one perspective, but it creates an opportunity for discussion and allows for a counter-perspective to be voiced when people disagree.
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anoymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unaffraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are.. When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face.. Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anounimous postings..
"The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it."
Agreed. As long as you change "earned" to "paid for".
It's nice to see a judge who is at least a little reluctant to throw her weight around.
Name a person that paid for our endorsement!
Judge Bita Khamsi was on the Veterans In Politics Talk Show on June 27th scrawl down to our archived shows and click onto this link at 36:30min onto the show and listen to an explosive interview: Veterans In Politics: 2015-06-27 | Melanie Thomas Co-Host: Guests: Bita Khamsi Las Vegas Justice of the Peace Department 6 and Dr. Walter Hammond Retired Army Veteran to discuss how our rights are being violated under the 14 Amendment of the Constitution – See more at: http://www.vegasallnetradio.com/veterans-in-politics.html#sthash.47mqaHcw.dpuf
http://audio.vegasallnetradio.com/VIP/VIP2015-06-27.mp3
Ditto! Veteran's in Politics is a complete joke of an organization. It has a catchy name but is lacking in any real substance. I would be embarrassed to use its endorsement in a campaign.
Holy shit, now we are going to have that troll, whatever his name is, who runs VIP back here with his stupid rants.
My favorite part of Veterans in Politics is the Canadian representative. Why is there a Canadian contingent of US veterans presumably involved in Canadian politics? Makes perfect sense for those wing nuts. The crazy dude is Steve Sanson and he's been here before. Bita is an excellent JP who was given a raw deal and has to clean it up, you can't hate her for dealing with that zoo. Samson is just butt hurt he didn't get what he wants.
Anonymous or coward whatever your name is?… We are Veterans In Politics International… Here is the definition for International mostly means something (a company, language, or organization) involving more than a single country. Dummy… What’s your name? When you fight for your country you will be a crazy dude too..
As for Bita Khamsi we will see next year now wont we?
You are good with words.
I don't need words I take action and I never hide!
You got moves like Jagger!
In re: the threat against Judge Khamsi at 1:47 – given the track record of Veterans in Politics for endorsing candidates who fail (Sue Lowden, Benjamin Donion, Amy Groves, etc), I'm placing my bets on Khamsi.
Its funny Anonymous how you can name the candidates that we endorsed who was not successful… How about naming the ones we did endorse and actually elected… I can assure you its 90% more than the ones that never made it… Are you one of the candidates that we didn’t endorse…? You sounded scorned… Anonymous who are YOU? Nothing but a CHICKEN!
By the way I don’t make threats never did!
Instead of coming to this website and bitching about the fact that those who leave comments are anonymous (which has long been the tradition of the blog), why don't you spend your time cleaning up the Veterans In Politics website. It looks like it was made by a middle school student in 1997.
Instead of hiding it seems like the only thing you know to do based on your experience. Why don't you tell me who you are so it can be a fair discussion chicken shit!
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anoymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unaffraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are.. When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face.. Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anounimous postings..
Anyone else reminded of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FnO3igOkOk
or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDSv6VWB6VE
Stevie is a middle school dropout, which explains the middle school level website. No one needs nor wants your endorsement, idiot. No one would knowingly associate with someone of your caliber. You need help. I would be happy to have Metro lock you up for a day or two for observation of your behavior. Maybe a little electrocution to tame your animal-like behavior.
I agree that Steve doesn't speak for veterans at all, and he disgraces the name when he goes on the attack as "veterans in politics". It's a joke. I've met very few actual veterans or politicians that respect this guy. He is a self promoting criminal trying to make a name for himself so he can run for something coming up. He wants something for nothing, or you end up his enemy and he bashes you on his "show" or spams every Facebook page with his illiterate blog. Learn who your real friends are Steve, because they aren't the reputable veterans groups, and they aren't the reputable politicians.
All you cowards that want to hide behind an “Anonymous” name. I have nothing to say to you with the exception of this. We educate and we take on causes and elected officials that you punks run from. By the way we have been doing it since 1993 and on the radio since 2005. We must be doing something right..
Welcome back, Steve. We missed you!
Graceful and tactful, as always.
VIP is 21 jump street!
Nobody has a name. Is that your birth name? How about chicken shit!
Steve, are you available to help Vicki Greco?
LOL. Aggressive much? Clown.
Got some anger management issues, Stevie.
PTSD is a bitch
I have lots of issues against A—holes that hide and don’t identify themselves.. The question is do you have an identity crises or just a COWARD!?
Anyone that’s not man or woman enough to identify themselves before they talk crap is projecting their bull crap.. If you want to talk crap about me say it to my face here is my number 702 283 8088 I don’t run nor hide from anyone, I never did and never will. Call it PTSD and thank you for defending your freedoms..
I think the PTSD comments are out of line. Regardless of what Steve's behavior now, he did serve in the military and that act deserves some respect. PTSD is a real ailment that veterans suffer from, not a joke or an insult.
That said, it's my opinion that Steve is a bully. Look at the comments in this thread. Are our elected judges really comfortable associating themselves with someone like this? Apparently so. And that is very sad.
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anoymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unaffraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are.. When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face.. Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anounimous postings..
Enough of the "cut and paste." You've made your point –
not very articulately
Take your pills, Stevie? It's time for the little blue pills. Tomorrow is white pill day, douchebag.
Is that the number he puts on the gay forums trolling for boys?
You are a joke, Stevie. You have mental, physical and social problems and could not make it in any other community. The more you talk, the closer you are to losing whatever respect you had in the community. Boy.
PTSD is a bitch and so is Steve. Or are you on the rag? PMS?
Hare is some video guidance for Stevie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hkNuykz2RE
Great…discriminate against women
Steve is a good guy. I'd like to see him kick the crap out of someone in a cage match or something. I wouldn't call that Veterans group he helps run a "hack" organization but I enjoy reading his articles. Semper Fi bitches!!!!!!
Thanks Steve!
Steve, I believe everybody appreciates your service, that should not be discounted. But your ad hominem attacks on a judge many of us know and respect diminishes you in our community. I don't know the case at all, but Bita is not one who throws around contempt like you throw around your patriotism. I just wish you'd be more judicious in your opinions, they would be respected more if that was the case. Additionally, many of us do not have the platform to trash individuals that you have and so we would rather avoid losing our jobs and/or getting trashed in various e-mails you send out on a regular basis.
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anoymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unaffraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are.. When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face.. Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anounimous postings..
Copy/Paste much?
Fear and a bunch of emotion that sounds as if it came from a 22 year old is about all you are capable of spewing. One of your commanding officers would laugh at you as you have allowed your weaknesses to come through bright and clear. Those same commanders would laugh at your comments related to fear. You are not even close on any count, junior.
You should also educate yourself, as your childish attempts to use the English language effectively have failed miserably. Obviously, you can cut/paste, but please do so with close attention to paragraph and sentence structure, as well as correct spelling and avoidance of run-on sentences, comma splices, missing verbs, etc. BOY.
Hi, Steve! Anonymous works only for those of us who are welcome here. Idiot.
On an unrelated matter, when you have dbas and akas affiliated with a defendant and you list them on one default, is that default effective as to those dbas and akas?
Thank you for the responses!
DBA's and AKA's are just that — different names for the same legal entity. Assuming your judge knows his/her law, it's the entity's legal/corporate name that needs to be correctly identified, not its 20 to 30 DBA's…
I don't have any respect for anybody that wants to jump on a blog and talk shit about me or anybody and hide behind an anonymous name. If these folks can't reveal their name because they are scared that they will lose their jobs then don't post anything. If these individuals are jealous because my organization has a platform and they don't. Too bad, that's from years of hard work and unafraid to take on controversial issues with our names attached. We know our stuff, we investigate and we educate. Some people don't like what we say, too bad. Not everything is glamorous. The people that received our endorsement, that's because they earned it. We are the only organization that has a panel, moderator, video tape our endorsement interviews place them on social media for all to see. With a disclaimer if you don't like who we endorse, then educate yourself. The people that don't like it never been endorsed by us, don't like who we endorsed, was kicked out of veterans in politics, or exposed for the piece of Crap they are… When we have a problem with someone they know about it. We don't backstab and smile to your face… Fear is not part of our vocabulary if we had fear we couldn't have defended this country. Some of you are jealous of the fact that we wore the uniform and you didn't. Some of our members never wore the uniform but they have a lot more backbone than many of you that hide behind anonymous postings…
Yawn. Whatever is wrong with you apparently made you forget you already posted this.
You are not Steve Sanson, you are Private Snowball!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgRCuxA6KMY
3:35 PM asked a very good question about defaulting dbas and akas. This is a great topic because so many of us encounter default issues in our everyday practice. Can anyone please assist 3:35 PM with her important question?
Steve,
We have many mutual friends IRL. I admire your service in the military and to the community. Let me say a few things to you that come from a loving, but tough place. You need to get it together. Whatever redeeming qualities you have are overshadowed by your boorish, rude behavior. You work so hard, but you're holding yourself back. Self examination can be hard, and sometimes painful. We are all imperfect beings, that's for sure. But might I suggest a moment of introspection where you can be honest with yourself in a way that will let you escape barriers holding you back – barriers that you built? Imagine what you could accomplish if you kept your hard work and zeal and dedication to the community but abandoned your insecurity and the vicious, puerile attacks that flow from it? Just food for thought.
Carry on, my friend.
Now he's going to go on a rant against you. "Blah blah blah, I'm no sissy, blah blah blah, I show no weakness, blah blah bah, bring it on."
He's not capable of the kind of maturity you urge.
I admire Steve for having the man marbles to go after certain elected officials and judges (Harter, Khamsi, Ochoa, and other bad judges I have read about) with FACTS and calls people out when they appear on his radio program. Go Steve! And I am not Steve Sanson…….but I bet he would approve this message.
Sanson, the same goes for you: if you don't like what's written, leave. Tough. Not everyone or everything is glamorous.
blog is dead
Blog is dead man! We missed you!
I think they should have picked someone who has a background in civil law. Dept. 6 is a CIVIL calendar. Judge Bita Khamsi is still handling it from her wheelhouse, which is criminal, and as a PD for years, at that. No offense, but it IS a different "handle." They should have changed Dept. 6 to a criminal calendar for her, and then given her time to take on a civil calendar so she could continue shadowing the other JP's, which she did for the first few weeks. It takes more time than a few weeks to get into the issues civil cases present, and vice versa for a civil lawyer coming into a criminal calendar.
Bits is a good judge. Why not judges with civil and criminal background?
Bits, sorry
Bita
We're going to go ahead and close the comments on this post. Please remember to keep your discourse civil.