The Goldberg thing is a non-story and the headline is typical Channel 8 garbage. His Supervised Release ends 2 months from today. They accused him of leaving Nevada without permission and having a DV arrest. The DV charge was dismissed. All the Feds wanted was for him leaving Nevada without permission was to put him on an ankle bracelet for the next 60 days. Prison was never in the discussion.
Feds dismissed it and all conditions were lifted. Of course Channel 8 never updated their story.
"Officer Brown indicates that she has not been able to serve the witnesses and requests the Court dismiss the Petition. The Court dismisses the petition. Defendant's terms of supervised release are MODIFIED to remove the Home Detention and Location Monitoring conditions. The No Contact condition will remain in place. Defendant is continued on present terms of release."
It does go to show you that the slightest hiccup and the press will always be on him like odor on you-know-what. Think if you are him and you pumped all of those millions of dollars into Channel 8 over the years and you cannot even get a fair story about what is going on.
No sympathy from me. What part of do not leave the State of Nevada did he not understand. There may be a ton of Californian's moving here to escape the nanny state, but most people know that the City of Santa Ana is not located in Nevada.
He should consider himself lucky that they didn't revoke his release.
He has 2 months left. They were never going to revoke his release. The only question was whether he would be on a bracelet for the last 2 months or not.
There were issues with the USPO processing travel requests around the holidays (this incident is alleged to have occurred on January 1) so that there were misunderstandings regarding which PO's were overseeing which low-risk offenders. That is why they dropped it on the leaving without permission and went exclusively after the issue of whether he committed another crime.
You are right– he is lucky that the USPO did the right thing and dropped it rather than blindly going forward without any evidence and in spite of its mistake.
Kihuen is calling his donors to run again. This guy is a pos. He allegedly harasses women. What are Harry Reid, Dina Titus, and Cortez Masto doing about this a-hole?
Kihuen IS an asshole, I'm not disputing that. HOWEVER, being a creepy single guy should not be a crime. That's what annoys me about the #metoo stuff, I support getting rid of the Harvey Weinstein's of the world, but Ruben is not Weinstein. There are a billion other reasons I wouldn't vote for him, but creepiness is not one of them.
I am voting Dina out, and I am voting Cortez Masto out. Go hang out at the gas and sip with Kihuen. I am taking my city back. Give my best to Harry Reid.
ALL OF YOU: Respectfully, any discussion about your disgust for people who sexually abuse, or take sexual advantage of women that doesn't include unconditional condemnation of the Pervert-In-Chief is (you'll excuse the expression) hard to swallow. W T H, people??
3:19– I agree with you. He is not immune from these castigations. However he is not running this cycle. So any discussion about Trump and your disgust for people who sexually abuse, or take sexual advantage of women that doesn't include unconditional condemnation of Kihuen is (you'll excuse the expression) hard to swallow.
Lol at the false equivalencies here. Kihuen seems like a scumbag and, if he runs, I hope he gets drilled in the primary. That being said, one party just (I think rightly) threw a rising star out of the Senate because he groped a women back when he was a comedian. At the same time, the other party was trying to elect a guy to the Senante who spent his 30's (while he was a prosecutor) trolling the mall for middle schoolers. The reaction to Kihuen could have been better, but plank in your eye before speck in your neighbor's and all that.
"There is no such right" in the BILL OF RIGHTS….."to keep and bear arms." Dah…..what's it doing in the BILL OF RIGHTS? But, the court "reasoned" the right to recall judges out of the Nevada Constitution last term. How? A 1976 addition to the state constitution impliedly repealed the recall for judges provision. ??? She'll fit in.
The Goldberg thing is a non-story and the headline is typical Channel 8 garbage. His Supervised Release ends 2 months from today. They accused him of leaving Nevada without permission and having a DV arrest. The DV charge was dismissed. All the Feds wanted was for him leaving Nevada without permission was to put him on an ankle bracelet for the next 60 days. Prison was never in the discussion.
Feds dismissed it and all conditions were lifted. Of course Channel 8 never updated their story.
"Officer Brown indicates that she has not been able to serve the witnesses and requests the Court dismiss the Petition. The Court dismisses the petition. Defendant's terms of supervised release are MODIFIED to remove the Home Detention and Location Monitoring conditions. The No Contact condition will remain in place. Defendant is continued on present terms of release."
Sorry all conditions except the No Contact with the girlfriend.
Glad that part of the nightmare is over for Randy.
It does go to show you that the slightest hiccup and the press will always be on him like odor on you-know-what. Think if you are him and you pumped all of those millions of dollars into Channel 8 over the years and you cannot even get a fair story about what is going on.
No sympathy from me. What part of do not leave the State of Nevada did he not understand. There may be a ton of Californian's moving here to escape the nanny state, but most people know that the City of Santa Ana is not located in Nevada.
He should consider himself lucky that they didn't revoke his release.
He has 2 months left. They were never going to revoke his release. The only question was whether he would be on a bracelet for the last 2 months or not.
There were issues with the USPO processing travel requests around the holidays (this incident is alleged to have occurred on January 1) so that there were misunderstandings regarding which PO's were overseeing which low-risk offenders. That is why they dropped it on the leaving without permission and went exclusively after the issue of whether he committed another crime.
You are right– he is lucky that the USPO did the right thing and dropped it rather than blindly going forward without any evidence and in spite of its mistake.
Rumor of significant exodus from ATMS.
Is the exodus happening at the top, bottom or middle? Or is it like rats leaving a sinking ship…everyone of them is just trying to make it to shore?
Yawn. Nobody cares.
@12:54 at least two people above you care.
Calls all go straight from reception to voice mail. Perhaps there is no one there, or maybe just par for the course.
Ask for Marsha Landreth. She is Eric's left hand woman.
Some of the workers' comp opened their own = Hooks Meng Schaan Clement, PLLC
Named partner "retired".
Kihuen is calling his donors to run again. This guy is a pos. He allegedly harasses women. What are Harry Reid, Dina Titus, and Cortez Masto doing about this a-hole?
They are all supporting him…of course! Nothing has changed.
Kihuen IS an asshole, I'm not disputing that. HOWEVER, being a creepy single guy should not be a crime. That's what annoys me about the #metoo stuff, I support getting rid of the Harvey Weinstein's of the world, but Ruben is not Weinstein. There are a billion other reasons I wouldn't vote for him, but creepiness is not one of them.
Kihuen and Wynn should become roommates. What a circle of jerks, instead a circle of friends. I voting all these gems out. All of them.
Kihuen is creepy. Would you want your wife or daughter alone with him on a elevator???
I am voting Dina out, and I am voting Cortez Masto out. Go hang out at the gas and sip with Kihuen. I am taking my city back. Give my best to Harry Reid.
You live in a deep-blue city in a rapidly bluing state. I would suggest you get used to it.
I am not supporting Dems who harass women. That is scary logic.
Harry Reid and Dina don't care about you. Reid is scared of getting beat up again by the mob.
2:31 those are the only reasons people like the aforementioned get elected. Harry Reid is a has been.
ALL OF YOU: Respectfully, any discussion about your disgust for people who sexually abuse, or take sexual advantage of women that doesn't include unconditional condemnation of the Pervert-In-Chief is (you'll excuse the expression) hard to swallow. W T H, people??
3:19– I agree with you. He is not immune from these castigations. However he is not running this cycle. So any discussion about Trump and your disgust for people who sexually abuse, or take sexual advantage of women that doesn't include unconditional condemnation of Kihuen is (you'll excuse the expression) hard to swallow.
3:49 is Aaron Ford
Lol at the false equivalencies here. Kihuen seems like a scumbag and, if he runs, I hope he gets drilled in the primary. That being said, one party just (I think rightly) threw a rising star out of the Senate because he groped a women back when he was a comedian. At the same time, the other party was trying to elect a guy to the Senante who spent his 30's (while he was a prosecutor) trolling the mall for middle schoolers. The reaction to Kihuen could have been better, but plank in your eye before speck in your neighbor's and all that.
What?
Boggity, boggity, let's go racin' folks…..
In an unrelated, I saw Judge Cadish at the Republican's Men Club campaigning. Yes, I just typed that sentence.
She is not liberal (contrary to the Heller blue slip fiasco). Not a surprise.
Cadish is not a hot mess.
Elissa Cadish is indecline.
"There is no such right" in the BILL OF RIGHTS….."to keep and bear arms." Dah…..what's it doing in the BILL OF RIGHTS? But, the court "reasoned" the right to recall judges out of the Nevada Constitution last term. How? A 1976 addition to the state constitution impliedly repealed the recall for judges provision. ??? She'll fit in.
Her paid for endorsement was there also.
Anyone gonna run against Steve Wolfson for DA? Is there a reason to?
This is such a trap.
I thought the exact same thing.
What do you mean? I just want to make sure the SOB doesn't get a free pass. I believe no one should run unopposed.
He is a terrible pantload of a DA but that is what also makes him untouchable as a candidate.
Anyone else get a "past due" email on bar dues, despite having a receipt from like a month ago?
Yes right here. More SBN quality at its finest.