Anyone know the Judge in the LVMPD case? That will go very far in determining the success. My own internal question is whether this is the sort of case a jury is going to be sympathetic to, or will they just think anyone going out to the situation gets what’s coming. I mean i guess the jury can really go either way, will be a major wild card.
Guest
Anonymous
January 23, 2026 10:26 am
The Robb story is insane. Why was she stalking Binau?
I can’t read anymore pages of this TPO application. It is atrociously written. I don’t understand how attorneys at this “prestigious” law firm can be such atrocious writers. Can someone please explain?
I am still trying to digest the fact that a more or less 60 year old man is dating an early 30’s associate at the same firm. . . . .after previously and casually banging a Judge his own age.
I’m an active member of the LDS Church. To the extent the Church failed to report known abuse, and/or leaders perpetrated abuse, victims deserve full vindication in the courts.
This article is curious, because it identifies the Defendant as a “high priest,” which, to outsiders sounds like a position of responsibility and authority. But a “high priest” is just a level of priesthood that every Mormon male eventually ascends to regardless of whether they are an actual leader (this automatic promotion was true in the 90’s, and is not necessarily the case anymore, but I don’t want to drift into a technical discussion). Suffice it to say, being a “high priest” by itself, does not constitute leadership or agency acting on behalf of the Church. In a local congregation, the local male leaders are the Bishop, his counselors (who must be high priests, perhaps this is where the confusion comes from), the Elders Quorum President and his counselors (who ARE NOT high priests).
This could just be a Complaint drafted by someone who imprecisely described status and leadership. It could also be a reporter who is unfamiliar with Mormonism. But it could also be a Plaintiff with a tenuous theory as to the institutional Church itself. Hard to tell. Whatever the case, I hope that at the end of the process, the victim feels heard and vindicated.
That’s a gross misrepresentation of what High Priest is. Most men only attain the level of High Priest when they are called as a bishopric or high council member which means this person held critical leadership roles in the local church at some time in their life.
12:45 PM here. That’s true now, but it wasn’t in the 90’s. In the 90’s (and before about 2010), men who reached about 40 or 45 and who had not been ordained to a High Priest because they had been in a Bishopric, High Council or Stake Presidency were transferred to the High Priests to be with the older men. The younger male adults (under 40ish) were in the Elders Quorum and the High Priests were all the old codgers over 40. This distinction collapsed when high priest groups were abolished at the ward level and now there is only an Elders Quorum (which still has high priests in it). In the 90’s almost every male over the age of 40-45ish functionally became a high priest as a matter of course. That’s just a simple fact. There were no 55 or 50 year old men in EQ’s in the 90’s. It’s so weird to be indignant over this point.
Mormon here. Can confirm. I took this as a lawyer trying to firm up a claim against the church as an institution. “High Priest” sounds like a representative of the church like a Priest would be in a catholic church. “An old guy in the ward” would not lend much help in terms of getting the church on the hook.
12:45 PM here. There are any number of reasons why the strange designation of “high priest” was used. From a purely tactical standpoint, I think it probably hurts the case because you get into a muddled explanation of what priesthood offices and callings are and aren’t (and even the overlay of the 90’s versus today). Just look at the mess of this exchange. If the “high priest” was a Bishop or bishopric counselor, just say so in laymans terms. “The Defendant was one of three men who oversaw and lead the congregation.” or “The Defendant was the leader of the men’s group in the congregation” If he really was just an old codger who had no leadership responsibilities, then you’ve got to come up with some other theory for vicarious liability, but just explain it clearly. The article does nothing to really tell us what the Defendant’s role and responsibilities, if any, were. Ultimately, though, what really matters is that there is a person out there who was profoundly harmed. I really do hope this process helps them. What a horrible thing to carry for decades, to say nothing of the experiences themselves.
It’s interesting that they chose counsel from Northern California. Seems like that is an unnecessary headwind. Hopefully she knows how to correctly pronounce Nevada.
The case is 2:26-cv-00123-JAD-BNW. The alleged abuser is her father. That nugget of information seems to have a somewhat important bearing on the liability of the church on abuse that occurred for 4 years before she disclosed it. There’s probably a viable claim on the failure to report. I think she’d have a stronger case if she alleged failure to supervise by the church for the failure to disclose by the bishop, but that’s just me. My heart goes out to her.
Guest
Anonymous
January 23, 2026 1:30 pm
I LURVE the redactions in the Picon Press posting of Kelci Binau’s kamikaze mission against Bridget Robb because they are so inconsistent.
– Pilates Studio is redacted in one place but identified as Loops Pilates elsewhere
– Boyfriend’s name is redacted in one location but the TPO asks Robb to stay away from “Matthew Addison’s house.” You mean this Matthew Addison? https://www.mcdonaldcarano.com/people/matt-addison/
– Law firm is redacted in her statement but McDonald Carano is identified at least 5 other places through the Application
She’s a family court judge….how would she ever have any connection to gaming law? The good people at McDonald Carano would never lower themselves to step foot across the street to family court in Reno. Facts!
Because Bridget Robb (Peck) was a really respected business litigator, one of the founders of the Washoe Business Court and did settlement conferences for business and commercial cases in Washoe, plus MC’s trust and estates practice.
Guest
Anonymous
January 23, 2026 2:18 pm
What great timing for Addison to be outed in the TPO Application on the same day that he is announced via press release to be a Board Member of the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada.
I give him credit, he’s got the ability to allegedly have a 70 year old judge in his rotation and at the same damn time allegedly shack up with a smoking 30 something associate…..TED talk forthcoming
If you are Jim Bradshaw or Bud Hicks and are watching your prestigious law firm get dragged by two of your attorneys tangling with a former judge, how would you react?
As a young associate decades ago, my managing partner imparted don’t sh*t where you eat upon me during my first annual review. It has stayed with me to this day.
To be fair I tend to be a connoisseur of bathrooms at the fine establishments at which I eat.
Guest
Anonymous
January 23, 2026 5:45 pm
Call it old fashioned, but finding a wonderful women who you love, getting married, and only having sex with her makes life much easier. What is the point of a 10 year long friends with benefits arrangement with someone you don’t love? If you just want sex, its better with someone you love.
But what if your wonderful woman who you love has a really beautiful friend who wants to be the sweet vermouth added into your old fashioned and turn it into a Manhattan?
Two things can be true at the same time: (1) Judge Robb should not have been incessantly driving and following Kelci Binau and (2) Kelci Binau and Matthew Addison should have thought long and hard about airing their dirty laundry in a manner that is now international news.
No one ridiculed her safety concerns (although some above have questioned if perhaps she was hyperbolic in her written Application qualifying pursuant to the statute(s)). Quite a few people have rightfully questioned the decision to pursue this path in light of the collateral damage that it was caused and will cause to other people. Bridget Robb has to live with her choices and actions; however so do Matthew Addison and Kelci Binau.
I think you just made @4:20’s point. What, exactly, was Binau supposed to do? Robb had stalked her hundreds of times and had been repeatedly told to stop. At what point should one reasonably expect such behavior to escalate into physical violence or property damage? The concern is plainly reasonable, regardless of whether the conduct meets the legal definition of stalking. That point is not actually in dispute, is it?
I don’t pratice much in Reno, and I am completely unfamiliar with the people involved in this story. But I will add that from a distance, I am very sympathetic to Robb—I am closer to her in age and (probably) intelligence than I am to Binau. But I still believe that Binau had no viable options for stopping or de-escalating the behavior, and that she made the right decision.
I have no doubt that Binau has an ego (most lawyers do), and her writing is poor (to say the least). But even lawyers with egos who are bad writers should be able to seek protection without ridicule or admonishment.
What really stands out is the comment about “the collateral damage that it has caused and will cause to other people.” That framing is notably self-centered in a situation involving several serious issues. There is no need to pile on or blame the victim. If the supposed “collateral damage” refers to the attorneys around “Baddison,” then this should be treated as a teachable moment about internal policies and firm culture, not as a critique of the person seeking protection.
“What, exactly, was Binau supposed to do?”
-Maybe (if the statements were made to RPD as Binau claims but for which we have no corroboration) have RPD effectuate a citation rather than file the Application in this form.
-Maybe have Addison be the applicant and Binau be the benefited party if you want to pursue a TPO so it is not framed as Jessica Rabbit vs. Jessica Tandy. We rely on Addison sending what turns out to be a couple of texts asking Robb to stop and then filing a very noteworthy Application for TPO. Could have gone to her chambers. Could have sought intervention of Egan Walker rather than him getting blindsided by an Order that he now has to respond to the RGJ about. Any of these options would have been much less salacious and probably not on Inside Edition.
-Maybe have the very firm who she has decided to drag through the mud intervene on her behalf (although that would have involved having to perhaps come clean to the management committee and partners that there had been/is relationships which put the firm is a bad light and potential jeopardy with facts that now are inescapably public and going to continue to be hashed out)
There is nothing self-centered about thinking like a lawyer when you are a lawyer. TPO was not her only option. TPO was certainly not her best option. Anyone who practices in these areas would and should have weighed the costs versus the benefits. That is not victim blaming; that is lawyering. Cool that she no longer has Judge Robb driving by her house and now will have People Magazine outside of her house.
How do you know that the management committee was unaware of the relationship? Additionally, switching the applicant and the benefited party is a distinction without a difference in this instance. Does Egan Walker have magical powers? Since when do the police do anything without a TPO? Are things upside down in Reno?
Good question about the management committee because I suspect they knew of the relationship. Text messages between Addison and Robb attached to TPO application acknowledge he lost an election in December, presumably to remain managing partner, as verified by his firm profile stating he was MP from 2018 to December 2025. Word on the street is all the partners knew and many weren’t happy but the firm allowed the relationship to continue.
“Jessica Rabbit vs. Jessica Tandy” wins this thread . . . . . Uncontested is right!
Guest
Anonymous
January 24, 2026 8:57 am
ICE just killed another protestor in Minnesota—land of hotpot and the nicest people you’ll ever meet. There were several ICE goons tackling one man, and then one of the goons thought it would be a good idea to murder the protestor. Yet Minnesotans continue to protest Amazing.
What do we do if these goons come here? We need a plan.
In addition to murders, an ICE agent has pleaded guilty to raping women in detention. I’m sure he’s the top of the iceberg. That’s because ICE agents are not the best of the best—they seem to be largely unsuccessful men desperate for a job and status. This is dangerous for all of us and our children, not only immigrants (who also don’t deserve brutality for simply being in the United States). ICE is routinely overstepping its mandate and is now a police force used against anyone who vocally opposes authoritarianism.
You realize that there is video from every angle showing that the man was being tackled by several armed men. ICE is now saying that the murdered man was “armed,” but we can all see from the multiple videos that the murdered man did not have a gun in his hands. At most, he likely had a hulstered gun which is legal for American citizens.
Having watched sev angles it seems he was filming and doing some traffic direction, ICE grabbed a female nearby, he went to help her, everyone was pepper sprayed, she moved away after other ice came to assist the first ice, victim pushed to ground, was pistol whipped, did not seem remotely possible to be aggression given that he was on ground and hands on ground, and then shot numerous times
I think the victim and woman he was helping were blinded by the pepper spray and were fearfully clinging to each other initially or he was trying to keep her from being pulled away.
Nicest people in Minnesota? The Governor, Mayor and authorities almost let Minneapolis burn to the ground worse than the Rodney King riots. They just need to put a stop to this rebellion and anarchy. Assist the federal authorities and be done with it. The deaths are unfortunate and would have been avoided with local law enforcement support. We have not had immigration enforcement for decades. There used to be immigration sweeps and crackdowns years ago in the garment industry. Dragnets. Immigration and local police. It has been forgotten because there has been no enforcement till now.
Come on. I am a Republican and former cop. I am all for law enforcement against violent criminals. But this is inexcusable. We are not murdering MS-13 gangs; we have a masked junta whose members are cold blooded murdering housewives and nurses. Law enforcement support would have meant law enforcement being allowed there. State and local law enforcement were excluded from the scene. The murder weapon was secreted away without the “local law enforcement support” you describe being allowed to participate.
Remember when we on the right were the party of lawful carry and curbing government waste and abuse? We have masked federal agents pulling over U.S. citizens because of the color of their skin and murdering citizens near their homes. If we are fan of “local law enforcement”, then we would let local law enforcement support get in there and investigate.
Which facts would those be? Nicole Good was on her own street. Alex Pretti was a Minneapolis resident and VA ICU Nurse who worked at the VA Hospital 6 miles from the location where he was beaten up and then murdered for stopping a bunch of masked cowards from beating up a woman. So which facts would you like to make straight?
If you show up to a riot with a loaded 9 mm firearm, pick a fight with law enforcement, and then refuse to disarm, there’s a pretty good chance you’re going to die…
ICE has no jurisdiction over American citizens. Zero. Nada. ICE is not “law enforcement” over Americans. ICE has become Trump’s personal, political army.
Look, I understand the sentiment. I do. You want to say that ICE doesn’t have general policing powers over your typical citizen. But when you say that is is not law enforcement, you’re ignoring the C – Customs. Maybe that’s fair, because I honestly think that these says, ICE is all about the I and is ignoring the C too. But Customs enforcement regularly deals with US citizens smuggling, and they absolutely have jurisdiction over them.
That said, fuck ICE now and forever. They need to be abolished.
Sometimes there are people on your side you wish were on the other. Read the room, my dude. The national conversation isn’t about customs enforcement investigating and detaining Americans who smuggle. No one wants to abolish that. The national conversation is about masked men, some of whom are confirmed white suprematists, most of whom are unqualified, going into American cities, detaining people without accountability or due process, and killing people. Americans are extremely grateful for law enforcement who are honest people. What we reject is a militarized force that appears loyal to Donald Trump personally rather than to the U.S. Constitution.
Stop making refence to the dumbass Rittenhouse. It doesn’t help your argument. You know what does help your argument? The Unite the Right rallies and open carrying during their protests. Hell, there was even a discharge at a protest, yet somehow the cops were able to not kill someone. I’m old enough to remember when 2A advocates loudly proclaimed their support for open carrying at protests during the Obama administration. Strange how few of them have spoken up in support of Pretti.
Last edited 21 days ago by Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
January 24, 2026 5:52 pm
I’m flabbergasted. The Minnesota Department of Corrections admonished the Department of Homeland Security. There are Republicans with backbones as it turns out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qXVrSs8x9o
Anyone know the Judge in the LVMPD case? That will go very far in determining the success. My own internal question is whether this is the sort of case a jury is going to be sympathetic to, or will they just think anyone going out to the situation gets what’s coming. I mean i guess the jury can really go either way, will be a major wild card.
The Robb story is insane. Why was she stalking Binau?
When they said “associate dating older partner in her firm”, Kelci is exactly the one I suspected. LOL.
Isn’t Kelci married to someone who isn’t a lawyer…
TPO Application claims she filed for divorce.
https://www.piconpress.com/documents/kelci
But also claims that she and Matthew Addison have been dating for almost 2 years. Wonder who else was FwB
I can’t read anymore pages of this TPO application. It is atrociously written. I don’t understand how attorneys at this “prestigious” law firm can be such atrocious writers. Can someone please explain?
Jealousy over Ex boyfriend
I am still trying to digest the fact that a more or less 60 year old man is dating an early 30’s associate at the same firm. . . . .after previously and casually banging a Judge his own age.
I mean other than the serious upgrade. . . . .
Upgrade for whom? Certainly not Kelci.
For Addison, certainly. . . .for Binau, we do not know. . . . .
60yr old v 37 yr old? We know that Kelsi could have probably done better.
Hubby or ex hubby looked to be around 60 too
Ew
I’m an active member of the LDS Church. To the extent the Church failed to report known abuse, and/or leaders perpetrated abuse, victims deserve full vindication in the courts.
This article is curious, because it identifies the Defendant as a “high priest,” which, to outsiders sounds like a position of responsibility and authority. But a “high priest” is just a level of priesthood that every Mormon male eventually ascends to regardless of whether they are an actual leader (this automatic promotion was true in the 90’s, and is not necessarily the case anymore, but I don’t want to drift into a technical discussion). Suffice it to say, being a “high priest” by itself, does not constitute leadership or agency acting on behalf of the Church. In a local congregation, the local male leaders are the Bishop, his counselors (who must be high priests, perhaps this is where the confusion comes from), the Elders Quorum President and his counselors (who ARE NOT high priests).
This could just be a Complaint drafted by someone who imprecisely described status and leadership. It could also be a reporter who is unfamiliar with Mormonism. But it could also be a Plaintiff with a tenuous theory as to the institutional Church itself. Hard to tell. Whatever the case, I hope that at the end of the process, the victim feels heard and vindicated.
That’s a gross misrepresentation of what High Priest is. Most men only attain the level of High Priest when they are called as a bishopric or high council member which means this person held critical leadership roles in the local church at some time in their life.
12:45 PM here. That’s true now, but it wasn’t in the 90’s. In the 90’s (and before about 2010), men who reached about 40 or 45 and who had not been ordained to a High Priest because they had been in a Bishopric, High Council or Stake Presidency were transferred to the High Priests to be with the older men. The younger male adults (under 40ish) were in the Elders Quorum and the High Priests were all the old codgers over 40. This distinction collapsed when high priest groups were abolished at the ward level and now there is only an Elders Quorum (which still has high priests in it). In the 90’s almost every male over the age of 40-45ish functionally became a high priest as a matter of course. That’s just a simple fact. There were no 55 or 50 year old men in EQ’s in the 90’s. It’s so weird to be indignant over this point.
Mormon here. Can confirm. I took this as a lawyer trying to firm up a claim against the church as an institution. “High Priest” sounds like a representative of the church like a Priest would be in a catholic church. “An old guy in the ward” would not lend much help in terms of getting the church on the hook.
12:45 PM here. There are any number of reasons why the strange designation of “high priest” was used. From a purely tactical standpoint, I think it probably hurts the case because you get into a muddled explanation of what priesthood offices and callings are and aren’t (and even the overlay of the 90’s versus today). Just look at the mess of this exchange. If the “high priest” was a Bishop or bishopric counselor, just say so in laymans terms. “The Defendant was one of three men who oversaw and lead the congregation.” or “The Defendant was the leader of the men’s group in the congregation” If he really was just an old codger who had no leadership responsibilities, then you’ve got to come up with some other theory for vicarious liability, but just explain it clearly. The article does nothing to really tell us what the Defendant’s role and responsibilities, if any, were. Ultimately, though, what really matters is that there is a person out there who was profoundly harmed. I really do hope this process helps them. What a horrible thing to carry for decades, to say nothing of the experiences themselves.
It’s interesting that they chose counsel from Northern California. Seems like that is an unnecessary headwind. Hopefully she knows how to correctly pronounce Nevada.
The case is 2:26-cv-00123-JAD-BNW. The alleged abuser is her father. That nugget of information seems to have a somewhat important bearing on the liability of the church on abuse that occurred for 4 years before she disclosed it. There’s probably a viable claim on the failure to report. I think she’d have a stronger case if she alleged failure to supervise by the church for the failure to disclose by the bishop, but that’s just me. My heart goes out to her.
I LURVE the redactions in the Picon Press posting of Kelci Binau’s kamikaze mission against Bridget Robb because they are so inconsistent.
– Pilates Studio is redacted in one place but identified as Loops Pilates elsewhere
– Boyfriend’s name is redacted in one location but the TPO asks Robb to stay away from “Matthew Addison’s house.” You mean this Matthew Addison? https://www.mcdonaldcarano.com/people/matt-addison/
– Law firm is redacted in her statement but McDonald Carano is identified at least 5 other places through the Application
When do the bar complaints/lawsuits start rolling in if Addison or McDonald Carano appeared before Judge Robb or utilized her as a mediator?
She’s a family court judge….how would she ever have any connection to gaming law? The good people at McDonald Carano would never lower themselves to step foot across the street to family court in Reno. Facts!
Because Bridget Robb (Peck) was a really respected business litigator, one of the founders of the Washoe Business Court and did settlement conferences for business and commercial cases in Washoe, plus MC’s trust and estates practice.
What great timing for Addison to be outed in the TPO Application on the same day that he is announced via press release to be a Board Member of the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada.
Also who was Bridget Robb’s biggest campaign donor in 2020? Matthew Addison according to the RGJ. https://www.rgj.com/story/news/politics/2020/10/12/2020-election-bushur-faces-robb-washoe-district-court-dept-13/5897735002/
I give him credit, he’s got the ability to allegedly have a 70 year old judge in his rotation and at the same damn time allegedly shack up with a smoking 30 something associate…..TED talk forthcoming
Robb is 63. Addison is 60. Binau is 37.
Those are very poor writing skills for a 37 year old.
Great writing skills if your goal is to get your picture in the New York Post and on Inside Edition.
Infidelity isn’t noble…
If you are Jim Bradshaw or Bud Hicks and are watching your prestigious law firm get dragged by two of your attorneys tangling with a former judge, how would you react?
By checking whether malpractice carriers cover emotional exhaustion and then quietly canceling all firm holiday parties.
Jettison 1. Jettison 2. Make examples out of them.
“Don’t sh*t where you eat” is an expression I heard many years ago, and it is more apt today than ever.
As a young associate decades ago, my managing partner imparted don’t sh*t where you eat upon me during my first annual review. It has stayed with me to this day.
Can I join in the self-congratulations among those of us who haven’t (yet) shat where we eat?
To be fair I tend to be a connoisseur of bathrooms at the fine establishments at which I eat.
Call it old fashioned, but finding a wonderful women who you love, getting married, and only having sex with her makes life much easier. What is the point of a 10 year long friends with benefits arrangement with someone you don’t love? If you just want sex, its better with someone you love.
But what if your wonderful woman who you love has a really beautiful friend who wants to be the sweet vermouth added into your old fashioned and turn it into a Manhattan?
Legit lol at this one.
Common sense. As uncommon as it is now days.
The more I hear about this story, the more convinced I am that Kelci Binau is Tracy Flick.
I see you took “Blaming the Victim 101.”
Two things can be true at the same time: (1) Judge Robb should not have been incessantly driving and following Kelci Binau and (2) Kelci Binau and Matthew Addison should have thought long and hard about airing their dirty laundry in a manner that is now international news.
I’m tired of men ridiculing women’s’ safety concerns.
No one ridiculed her safety concerns (although some above have questioned if perhaps she was hyperbolic in her written Application qualifying pursuant to the statute(s)). Quite a few people have rightfully questioned the decision to pursue this path in light of the collateral damage that it was caused and will cause to other people. Bridget Robb has to live with her choices and actions; however so do Matthew Addison and Kelci Binau.
I think you just made @4:20’s point. What, exactly, was Binau supposed to do? Robb had stalked her hundreds of times and had been repeatedly told to stop. At what point should one reasonably expect such behavior to escalate into physical violence or property damage? The concern is plainly reasonable, regardless of whether the conduct meets the legal definition of stalking. That point is not actually in dispute, is it?
I don’t pratice much in Reno, and I am completely unfamiliar with the people involved in this story. But I will add that from a distance, I am very sympathetic to Robb—I am closer to her in age and (probably) intelligence than I am to Binau. But I still believe that Binau had no viable options for stopping or de-escalating the behavior, and that she made the right decision.
I have no doubt that Binau has an ego (most lawyers do), and her writing is poor (to say the least). But even lawyers with egos who are bad writers should be able to seek protection without ridicule or admonishment.
What really stands out is the comment about “the collateral damage that it has caused and will cause to other people.” That framing is notably self-centered in a situation involving several serious issues. There is no need to pile on or blame the victim. If the supposed “collateral damage” refers to the attorneys around “Baddison,” then this should be treated as a teachable moment about internal policies and firm culture, not as a critique of the person seeking protection.
“What, exactly, was Binau supposed to do?”
-Maybe (if the statements were made to RPD as Binau claims but for which we have no corroboration) have RPD effectuate a citation rather than file the Application in this form.
-Maybe have Addison be the applicant and Binau be the benefited party if you want to pursue a TPO so it is not framed as Jessica Rabbit vs. Jessica Tandy. We rely on Addison sending what turns out to be a couple of texts asking Robb to stop and then filing a very noteworthy Application for TPO. Could have gone to her chambers. Could have sought intervention of Egan Walker rather than him getting blindsided by an Order that he now has to respond to the RGJ about. Any of these options would have been much less salacious and probably not on Inside Edition.
-Maybe have the very firm who she has decided to drag through the mud intervene on her behalf (although that would have involved having to perhaps come clean to the management committee and partners that there had been/is relationships which put the firm is a bad light and potential jeopardy with facts that now are inescapably public and going to continue to be hashed out)
There is nothing self-centered about thinking like a lawyer when you are a lawyer. TPO was not her only option. TPO was certainly not her best option. Anyone who practices in these areas would and should have weighed the costs versus the benefits. That is not victim blaming; that is lawyering. Cool that she no longer has Judge Robb driving by her house and now will have People Magazine outside of her house.
How do you know that the management committee was unaware of the relationship? Additionally, switching the applicant and the benefited party is a distinction without a difference in this instance. Does Egan Walker have magical powers? Since when do the police do anything without a TPO? Are things upside down in Reno?
Good question about the management committee because I suspect they knew of the relationship. Text messages between Addison and Robb attached to TPO application acknowledge he lost an election in December, presumably to remain managing partner, as verified by his firm profile stating he was MP from 2018 to December 2025. Word on the street is all the partners knew and many weren’t happy but the firm allowed the relationship to continue.
“Jessica Rabbit vs. Jessica Tandy” wins this thread . . . . . Uncontested is right!
ICE just killed another protestor in Minnesota—land of hotpot and the nicest people you’ll ever meet. There were several ICE goons tackling one man, and then one of the goons thought it would be a good idea to murder the protestor. Yet Minnesotans continue to protest Amazing.
What do we do if these goons come here? We need a plan.
In addition to murders, an ICE agent has pleaded guilty to raping women in detention. I’m sure he’s the top of the iceberg. That’s because ICE agents are not the best of the best—they seem to be largely unsuccessful men desperate for a job and status. This is dangerous for all of us and our children, not only immigrants (who also don’t deserve brutality for simply being in the United States). ICE is routinely overstepping its mandate and is now a police force used against anyone who vocally opposes authoritarianism.
Minnesota is the land of Hot Dish. And yeah swooping 2 years olds and 5 year olds off to Texas is getting old to this Republican.
Hot dish! I stand corrected. Thanks.
Not a problem. I come from the land of (casse)roling with the punches
@ 8:57
Hyperbole by someone who gets her/his news from Tik Tok or from Facebook “friends” and believes everything said therein is true.
You realize that there is video from every angle showing that the man was being tackled by several armed men. ICE is now saying that the murdered man was “armed,” but we can all see from the multiple videos that the murdered man did not have a gun in his hands. At most, he likely had a hulstered gun which is legal for American citizens.
ICE is out of control:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DT53S8HEqLG/?igsh=MWs0dXgzNDQwazVlZw%3D%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CD3nSQbX0E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPNl7zCShmE
Having watched sev angles it seems he was filming and doing some traffic direction, ICE grabbed a female nearby, he went to help her, everyone was pepper sprayed, she moved away after other ice came to assist the first ice, victim pushed to ground, was pistol whipped, did not seem remotely possible to be aggression given that he was on ground and hands on ground, and then shot numerous times
I think the victim and woman he was helping were blinded by the pepper spray and were fearfully clinging to each other initially or he was trying to keep her from being pulled away.
Nicest people in Minnesota? The Governor, Mayor and authorities almost let Minneapolis burn to the ground worse than the Rodney King riots. They just need to put a stop to this rebellion and anarchy. Assist the federal authorities and be done with it. The deaths are unfortunate and would have been avoided with local law enforcement support. We have not had immigration enforcement for decades. There used to be immigration sweeps and crackdowns years ago in the garment industry. Dragnets. Immigration and local police. It has been forgotten because there has been no enforcement till now.
Is it your position that killing people in order to detain someone in the country without permission is acceptable?
Come on. I am a Republican and former cop. I am all for law enforcement against violent criminals. But this is inexcusable. We are not murdering MS-13 gangs; we have a masked junta whose members are cold blooded murdering housewives and nurses. Law enforcement support would have meant law enforcement being allowed there. State and local law enforcement were excluded from the scene. The murder weapon was secreted away without the “local law enforcement support” you describe being allowed to participate.
Remember when we on the right were the party of lawful carry and curbing government waste and abuse? We have masked federal agents pulling over U.S. citizens because of the color of their skin and murdering citizens near their homes. If we are fan of “local law enforcement”, then we would let local law enforcement support get in there and investigate.
“and murdering citizens near their homes”
Get your facts straight.
Which facts would those be? Nicole Good was on her own street. Alex Pretti was a Minneapolis resident and VA ICU Nurse who worked at the VA Hospital 6 miles from the location where he was beaten up and then murdered for stopping a bunch of masked cowards from beating up a woman. So which facts would you like to make straight?
If you show up to a riot with a loaded 9 mm firearm, pick a fight with law enforcement, and then refuse to disarm, there’s a pretty good chance you’re going to die…
ICE has no jurisdiction over American citizens. Zero. Nada. ICE is not “law enforcement” over Americans. ICE has become Trump’s personal, political army.
ICE is a law enforcement agency and ICE officers are law enforcement personnel. That’s a matter of law.
They’re not even post-certified. Come on. Law enforcement? Give me a break. Even IRS CI are post-certified. ICE is bunch of incels in tactical gear.
Look, I understand the sentiment. I do. You want to say that ICE doesn’t have general policing powers over your typical citizen. But when you say that is is not law enforcement, you’re ignoring the C – Customs. Maybe that’s fair, because I honestly think that these says, ICE is all about the I and is ignoring the C too. But Customs enforcement regularly deals with US citizens smuggling, and they absolutely have jurisdiction over them.
That said, fuck ICE now and forever. They need to be abolished.
Sometimes there are people on your side you wish were on the other. Read the room, my dude. The national conversation isn’t about customs enforcement investigating and detaining Americans who smuggle. No one wants to abolish that. The national conversation is about masked men, some of whom are confirmed white suprematists, most of whom are unqualified, going into American cities, detaining people without accountability or due process, and killing people. Americans are extremely grateful for law enforcement who are honest people. What we reject is a militarized force that appears loyal to Donald Trump personally rather than to the U.S. Constitution.
…
A riot? There was no effing riot. ICE started the fight with him, not the other way around. Then ICE summarily murdered him after he was disarmed.
Watch the video.
Which type of loaded gun did Kyle Rittenhouse show up to a riot with?
Stop making refence to the dumbass Rittenhouse. It doesn’t help your argument. You know what does help your argument? The Unite the Right rallies and open carrying during their protests. Hell, there was even a discharge at a protest, yet somehow the cops were able to not kill someone. I’m old enough to remember when 2A advocates loudly proclaimed their support for open carrying at protests during the Obama administration. Strange how few of them have spoken up in support of Pretti.
I’m flabbergasted. The Minnesota Department of Corrections admonished the Department of Homeland Security. There are Republicans with backbones as it turns out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qXVrSs8x9o